5 Comments

  1. Thanks for having me on the show. I hope your listeners enjoy it and learn a little bit more about Deep Isolation and nuclear waste disposal.

  2. Ultimate disposal of high level waste is irrelevant – the status quo (ISFSI) is adequate – Deep Isolation focuses on a technical solution for a red herring/ distraction/ tangential issue presented by antinuclear opposition. Locating casks or little PWRs deep into bore holes does not improve any figure of merit in waste management or power operations. We really need to elevate HGR’s “practical vs. academic reactor” essay to the status of truism or logical fallacy considering the CONSTANT roll-out of ‘advanced’ nuclear concepts pitched by hobbyists and posers.

  3. @Michael Scarangella

    From a technical perspective, ISFSI is fine.

    It has not convinced enough people to make it adequate from a political point of view. The current payments from the taxpayer funded settlement fund total almost as much as the NRC’s entire budget. There are still plenty of nuclear industry experts pressing for a permanent solution to be implemented – even if it is not heavily used in the foreseeable future.

    No comment regarding little PWRs at the bottom of deep boreholes.

  4. Rod

    You’re welcome. Please check by here periodically during the next couple of weeks to see if there are any comments or questions that you want to address.

  5. In my own little way, I have been using Deep Isolation as a reply when people ask about Nuclear Waste. I have linked their website in replies and encouraged people to consider this. While dry cask storage is fine for now, in many places I have hoped for years to see nuclear deployed, the bore hole solution is better because of the out of sight out of mind effect. It greatly reduces the ability for Anti-Nuclear protestors to grandstand. I also like it because it can be implemented in nearly any location around the world, if not directly on-site then within a short distance. I like the ability to retrieve the rods for possible future use. The simplicity is very appealing and I bet technical solutions would rapidly improve the equipment (tweaking the designs) if there was a large order book and several installations testing the actual conditions.

    Regarding mini PWR’s I would really like the ability to use the slightly used fuel to heat a swimming pool. But then, I am far more relaxed about radiation than most. A pool with a storage cistern to the side about 30 feet down and using convection to move the water would give a long term solution to cold winter days when you want to swim. Well if dreams were horses, beggars would ride. On the other hand, there might be a way to use the decay heat generated in that bore hole…

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • The Atomic Show #015 – Can more nuclear energy affect rising gas prices

    During show number 15 of The Atomic Show, Shane and I discuss the effects of ever increasing gasoline prices on people that need to drive light trucks as part of the way that they earn their living. We then discuss how nuclear power, specifically smaller nuclear reactors designed to compete in markets currently dominated by…

  • The Atomic Show #029 – Nuclear power in space

    Space exploration applications of nuclear power Space exploration is critically dependent on energy sources that are long lasting and can operate in a vacuum. Nuclear power fits the bill, but there have always been objections that limited its applications. Objections notwithstanding there have also been a number of missions where the only real solution was…

  • Atomic Show #181 – The Year After Fukushima (Part 2)

    There was so much to talk about regarding the way that the world responded to the great north east Japan earthquake and tsunami – and the subsequent damage to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station that I gathered a second group of people in the evening of Sunday March 11, 2012. This group included Will…

  • Update on fast reactor group challenge to MIT

    Steve Kirsch, an MIT graduate and enough of an entrepreneurial success to have an auditorium at the school that carries his name, has updated his challenge to the faculty at his alma mater in a post on The Huffington Post titled Is MIT Afraid to Debate Nuclear Report?. Steve is quite serious about this challenge…

  • Atomic Show #226 – Nuclear tour de France reunion

    On Wednesday, November 12, I got together with two friends. The three of us were 60% of a group of five writers and bloggers given the opportunity to visit a sampling of nuclear facilities in France owned and operated by Areva. That experience helped form a strong bond. We missed our other two companions from…