5 Comments

  1. Rod Adams wrote:
    Is it because the advertiser supported media in the US has been taught to look down on factory workers instead of celebrating their skills and craftsmanship?
    Money and power (and I don’t mean megawatts) are found together. Large amounts of money have been associated (at least until recently) with the dealings of the financial world. Just making stuff is really hard work, though ultimately making stuff is the source of wealth that money represents. Unfortunately, to too large of a degree, the making of money has been divorced from the making of wealth (useful stuff).
    There is an interesting piece in Business Week by Andy Grove that addresses manufacturing and jobs in this country. I don’t know that I agree with his perscriptions, but his observations give one pause.

  2. Kevin Phillips in his book “American Theocracy” (2006) explores this economic transformation from making useful things to focusing on making money by financial speculation and the like, which he called “financialization” of the economy, as a common late-stage phenomenon of decaying Empires. He explored this theme in greater detail in his follow-on book “Bad Money” in 2008. A broad-based improvement in economic health will be impossible unless we change from the current path set in motion by Reagan that continued through to Clinton with the coup de grace wielded by Bush/Cheney. The power of the financial sector is at an all-time high and, not coincidentally, the percentage of national income going to the top 1% is on par with what it was in 1929. The economy is completely out of balance due to the greed, excess and corruption of our own financial “ruling class.” Think Enron at work on a systemic basis, including the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Treasury. Reform the Banks and Wall St. and “cast out the moneychanges from the temple” then we can get back to building a sustainable robust economy powered by cheap, limitless carbon-free nuclear power. Until that is done, we won’t have the means of investment to fix this huge mess and re-engineer our energy infrastructure.

  3. @Steve – I’m all in favor of ” building a sustainable robust economy powered by cheap, limitless carbon-free nuclear power” but would you mind defining “greed” and “excess”? What is the objective measure of these terms and who decides on the benchmark?

  4. @DocForesight – IMHO greed is a bit like art or pornography – there is no objective definition, but I certainly know it when I see it. Some things in life cannot be measured or put into “metrics” no matter what Donald Rumsfeld tried to teach his senior officers. Some things require judgement, a fine eye, exceptional taste buds and or human intuition.

  5. Well I think if somebody gets more then 10 times the median income it is greed, counterproductive and excessive, nothing mysterious about it.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Rebuttal to Caldicott – academic paper by Luke

    A couple of days ago I mentioned a new pro-nuclear blog titled “Some Truths of Things” written by a grad student in Melbourne, Australia. In that post I also mentioned that he has written a detailed academic paper – still a work in progress, but with references and citations – that is a rebuttal to…

  • Tortuous licensing for nuclear energy is imposed by conscious human decisions. Wind and solar unreliability and fossil fuel limitations are imposed by nature

    All available energy sources have their limitations and disadvantages as well as their advantages. These limitations are generally well known and frequently repeated. “Everyone knows” most of the following litany of negatives: The world’s supply of oil is limited and concentrated in politically unstable regions of the world. Natural gas is explosive and expensive to…

  • Day -1 At American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting 2009

    Today is the first official day of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) Winter Meeting for 2009. The title of this year’s meeting is “Nuclear Power: Crafting Energy Solutions”. During the plenary session that is scheduled for this morning at 8:00-11:30 two US Senators (James Webb (D-VA) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN)) are scheduled to provide information…

  • Money Manager's View on Nuclear Power Investments

    Time is running short before I have to leave for my day job, but I wanted to share a link to an interesting article from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel titled Nuclear power should be generating a major boost in business. Commentary is welcome.

  • Jevons Paradox in Action

    There is a story in the Sunday, January 25, 2009 issue of the Washington Post that is contains one of the best illustrations of the Jevons Paradox that I have seen in a while. (From the Wikipedia entry – “In economics, the Jevons Paradox (sometimes called the Jevons effect) is the proposition that technological progress…

  • China Investing in New Power Generation Technology

    Some skeptics on the need for the United States to invest in cleaner energy production point to India and China and claim that any investments that we make in that area will be overcome by increased emissions from those large, densely populated countries with more rapidly growing economies. People on the other side of the…