One Comment

  1. You do realize that these arctic oscillations are natural, don’t you? For fuck’s sake, you realize there is massive politics at work to blame everything and the kitchen sink on global warming, and to bury every admission that it’s not the cause, right? Like here http://news.mongabay.com/2007/1113-nasa.html
    Seriously, how can someone bemoan how the anti-nuclear retards blame everything on nuclear plants and then in the next breath do the exact same thing on global warming? Do you evern appreciate that the biosphere’s role in climate, responsible for the majority of the effect, is largely unknown? And NOT ACCOUNTED FOR in those pinheaded fluid dynamics models laughingly called “climate models”?
    The atmosphere, and everything that feeds into it like the biosphere, was not made to be simple and understandable by humans. It’s not a nuclear reactor Rod. It’s not something that you can itemize and analyze and figure out. It’s not linear, it’s dynamic, it’s full of feedbacks and it’s massively parallel. It’s not something the human species has figured out. And we won’t, not for a long time.
    This pretense that we understand climate only hurts the real science. Climate change is a bunch of over-politicized crap whose only redeeming, only CERTAIN, feature is its usefulness to phase out coal and natural gas burning. That is all.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Harvard International Review on Iran's nuclear motives

    After writing about Iran’s motivations for atomic energy independence, I came across the following article in the online edition of the Harvard International Review – Forced to Fuel – http://hir.harvard.edu/articles/1294/ which discusses, with more detail and rigor – the current electrical power supply situation in Iran.

  • Overcoming Mythology – Real Analysis Regarding Carbon Intensity of Uranium Fuel Cycle

    It might surprise many people who are not actively involved in discussions about our energy future, but there is a persistent myth that comes up with depressing regularity regarding the carbon dioxide emissions associated with various energy sources. The myth is that nuclear power plants – which produce electricity by converting uranium fission heat into…

  • UK is leading the way for a reconsideration of nuclear in the EU

    As many of you know, the UK has been indicating for many months that it is reconsidering its previous stance that held that nuclear power was not economic and not a good option for future plants. That position has been in place since Sizewell B came on line in the mid 1990s. However, times have…

  • UK Editorial writer likes carbon capture better than nuclear

    The Sunday Herald (out of Scotland) published an op-ed piece titled Carbon capture and storage is the way ahead that we refuse to take that claims that the UK government is off track in its recently issued energy white paper titled Meeting the Energy Challenge. According to the commentary, nuclear power will take too long…