6 Comments

  1. Lovely and relaxing. I can never remember, are you in VA or NC? I grew up in northern VA and even now, 40 years later, Texas just doesn’t look right. The landscape in your photos, that’s how a countryside is supposed to look.

  2. @Jeff

    I’m in Forest, VA, not far from Bedford, home of Sharp Top and Round Top (aka Peaks of Otter), along with the famous Bedford Boys who led the charge on D-day.

    My view is similar to the one Thomas Jefferson had from his Poplar Forest summer home.

  3. Thanks for the mention, Rod.

    You have one fantastic spread and vista there! The dawns and dusks in autumn must be awesome as heaven! Your sweat and skull-crushing well deserve it! I only wish more Vermonters and others appreciated such too!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  4. Something just hit me again. I just realized that the Japanese NRA must secure local support to restart a nuke.

    I strongly disagree that this should be part of their decision making process. They have to certify and that is it.

  5. As a Brit, the most striking thing about those views is the trees! Most of our forests were cut down for fuel and structural materials over the past few hundred years, the remainder only being saved by the advent of coal and steel. Now our big coal generators are switching to wood again since it’s been classed as ‘renewable’ and qualifies for subsidies. The total forested area of the UK is about 3 million hectares, while (based on the numbers for Drax) a wood-burning coal station seems to require about 600,000 hectares per GW for sustainable operation. Obviously it’s not feasible for Drax et al to get their wood here, so it’s mostly being imported from North America. Watch out!

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-25/biggest-english-polluter-spends-1-billion-to-burn-wood-energy

  6. In the early 1900s 45% of Africa was covered by forests. Today it is 4%. Why? People need heat for food, laundry, home heating, and bathing purposes. Had Africa as many coal power stations as the US has, they would have most of that lost forest back, even with the people pressure. Looks like the UK is going backwards.

    N & S Korea. North is barren and treeless adn suffers from flash flooding. South is lush and green. Why? Capitalism is part of it, but cutting trees is so anti-green, yet this is what green policies encourage so strongly.

    Then there’s the toxic sludge generated by mining for rare earth metals that feature so prominently in wind turbines. This sludge is far more toxic than the sludge from coal mining or uranium mining. But hey those windmills are so greeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennn!#$.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • No fan of renewable energy projects

    Many of my colleagues in the energy business try to be environmentally correct and do not like to make clear statements that criticize any particular energy source. They especially avoid any hint that they actively oppose the development of the “popular” renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. (Note: At one time, biomass had…

  • Why does ERCOT credit wind capacity at less than 9%?

    For a number of years, the planners on the ERCOT (Texas) grid assumed that wind projects would provide less than 9% of their nameplate capacity towards meeting peak demand. That assumed number for “Effective Load-Carrying Capability” (ELCC) was based on the fact that wind production is not dependable and may be inversely correlated with demand,…

  • Industrial wind energy benefits wealthy at expense of many

    Guest Post by Willem Post The Green Mountain Power (GMP)-instigated 63 MW Lowell wind turbine facility with (21) 3 MW Danish wind turbines stretched along 4 miles of ridge lines has nothing to do with community-scale wind, everything with utility-scale wind. GMP is using blatant PR to soft-soap/deceive Vermonters. It is a capital intensive (63…

  • Hard reality – biofuels are a loser, despite all the hope and hype

    I’ve been spending the past hour or so reading an excellent paper written by a US Naval aviator titled Twenty-First Century Snake Oil: Why the United States Should Reject Biofuels as Part of a Rational National Energy Security Strategy. (Note: The link for the original paper is broken, but CAPT Kiefer has published another version…

  • Atomic Show #260 – Pro-nuclear voices from COP23 in Bonn. Not a warm welcome

    This episode of the Atomic Show is a conversation among five clean energy advocates who attended the COP with the goal of sharing what they know about the ways that nuclear energy can help reduce global emissions while also providing a growing amount of reliable power. With more power, more people will have a pathway…