• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

The Atomic Show #26 – Helium, MIT study, coal

August 23, 2006 By Rod Adams

Topics range from helium to coal and include high temperature gas reactors.

Shane and I get our groove back and engage in a geeky discussion on topics ranging from helium to coal and somehow manage to include such topics as aviation safety, nuclear engineering career paths, computing the cost of common products like a liter of water, assumptions underlying the MIT study titled the Future of Nuclear Energy, the geology that results in helium contamination of natural gas, a new business model for building nuclear power plants, Ayn Rand’s Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged and a singing act that included a cello and a helium bottle.

We are obviously biased, but think that this show is one of our better efforts. We hope you agree. Feedback is always welcome.

Here are some links to articles and topics that we discussed during the show:

Lighter than Air

Russia’s Energy Strategy

The Future of Nuclear Power

The Nuclear Option

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 46:55 — 16.1MB)

Subscribe: Android | Google Podcasts | RSS

Filed Under: Podcast

About Rod Adams

Atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. Financial, strategic, and political analyst. Former submarine Engineer Officer. Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast. Resume available here.

Please subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John Wheeler says

    August 25, 2006 at 4:14 AM

    Rod and Shane,

    Great discussion of the MIT Study. As you stated, many of the assumptions that went into that piece of work have turned out to be invalid for so many reasons. I’ve been tempted to contact the original authors and ask them to update it. Perhaps we should get a working group together and revise it ourselves, then put out a press release and hold a news conference – Call it “Return to MIT – Why Nuclear Power Is on The Comeback”.

    Do you think the NY Times and the Washington Post would show up?

    Keep up the Great Work!

    John

    “This Week in Nuclear”

  2. Rod Adams says

    August 25, 2006 at 6:39 PM

    John:

    Great idea. Whenever you are ready to put together the working group, count me in. As I mentioned in the show, I have reconstructed the model that the MIT group used in their study – it is a valuable tool for conducting sensitivity analysis to understand what really drives the complex equation of a cost per kilowatt hour. An awful lot of assumptions and predictions have to be made to come up with that number, especially for capital intensive projects with potentially long useful lives.

    Rod

  3. Lawrence says

    March 8, 2010 at 6:55 AM

    When I listen to this podcast, Rod’s voice is very quiet compared to Shane’s. I’ve noticed this on a few other of the atomic show podcasts. It’s as though Rod is not wearing a headset or speaking into the mike. I also notice Rod’s voice appears to be concentrated in the left channel.

    Alternatively it could be something wrong with my playback, but all I did was download the mp3 and play it using mediaplayer (I also tried winamp).

    Does anyone else get this? Is there some setting at my end I should check?

  4. Rod Adams says

    March 8, 2010 at 9:51 AM

    Lawrence – I had some microphone issues for a few shows. I fixed the problem, but never went back and re-recorded the shows that had issues.

    Nothing is wrong with your playback.

  5. Lawrence says

    March 8, 2010 at 1:11 PM

    One thing I found I could do with winamp, which has an equalizer, is shift the sound all to the left, and then turn up the volume. Shifting the sound all to the left speaker channel makes your and Shane’s audio about equal.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

The Fearless Green Deal

Did US Navy patent a functional fusion device?

Sharing message at #StrikeWithUs – We can use nuclear energy to address climate change

Atomic Show #267 – Dr. Lauren Jackson addresses radiophobia

What exploded in Russia on Aug 8? My estimate is a (chemical) booster rocket for a nuclear powered cruise missile.

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2019 · Atomic Insights