4 Comments

  1. Rod, you need to update the filmmakers on that scare ad about Shoreham that the oil people ran during the controversy over the plant opening. Or maybe you already have shown it to James. Talk about a smoking gun!

  2. Gwyneth – actually, James and Ray were the ones who found it and shared it with me. They discovered it during their library document searches.
    I think that the final product is going to be interesting and useful. Harvey and Karl do an excellent job of playing themselves and demonstrating the foolishness of their positions. You, on the other hand come off rather well as a person with critical thinking skills who is willing to change her mind when provided access to better information.

  3. Hi Rod,
    I’m a newbie to your blog. I was a consultant to (and former employee of) GE on the Shoreham Project after the ill-fated decision to not proceed beyond hot testing. The fuel had to be removed before complete decommissioning. We actually took the slightly irradiated fuel and made pioneering shipments of it by truck, barge and rail to the Limerick Station in PA for reinsertion and use. That series of shipments remains a model for the intermodal movement of this material. In this case there was a need to preserve the mechanical integrity of the assemblies since they were going back in-core in. I wrote a complete report on the entire operation for the DOE – OCRWM. Was a great project even though the demise of Shoreham was a huge waste.

  4. Robert – welcome to Atomic Insights and thank you for sharing your thoughts on Shoreham.
    It is definitely a story that continues to influence the progress of the nuclear industry; one of the reasons that it is difficult to finance a plant is that financial people in New York are aware of the fact that the plant was very contentious during construction, received its operating license, but was never allowed to operate and produce revenue to repay the loans.
    A large fraction of the financial industry is probably still personally writing checks every month in their electric bills to pay off those loans, even today.
    It is important for the nuclear industry to really understand what happened and why it happened so that they can avoid its recurrence.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Rhode Island's Public Utilities Commission Rejects Off-shore Wind Project – 24.4 cents per kilowatt hour (plus 3.5% per year "inflation") is just too expensive

    The Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission has rejected a power purchase agreement negotiated by Deepwater Wind and National Grid. Their justification is that the agreement did not meet the required standard in state law that a power production project be “commercially reasonable”. The agreement, which was for the output of 8 large turbines installed off…

  • A Nuclear Engineer Willing To Endure Name Calling To Share Knowledge

    A friend shared a link to a well written, fact-based opinion piece by Donald Jones published in TheStar.com titled No Future For Wind In Ontario. According to Jones’s by-line, he is a retired professional engineer with 35 years of experience in CANDU reactor design. Here are some quotes from the piece that are particularly important:…

  • Calvert Cliffs III – Upcoming PSC Public Meeting Schedule

    A couple of days ago I mentioned that the Maryland Public Service Commission would be holding a series of meetings in southern Maryland for people interested Unistar’s proposal to build a third nuclear power plant at Calvert Cliffs. Here are the details for the time and place of those meetings: What: Maryland Public Service Commission…

  • Jordan Has Ambitious Nuclear Power Plans

    I have been aware that many nations in the Middle East are looking towards nuclear power as a vital part of their future energy mix, but until this morning I was unaware of the scope of the Kingdom of Jordan’s plans. According to Taylor Luck’s December 22, 2008 article in the Jordan Times titled Aqaba…

  • Cheap Gas Drumbeat – Quotes from the Chorus of Chanters

    This post will be one that evolves over time – especially if I can get some help from readers. My intention is to put together a representative series of quotes and links that show the rhythmic beat of the “cheap gas” mantra. I am not a believer – I think that the oil and gas…

  • Nuclear Power Training Graduation

    On 21 April, 2006, I had the opportunity to attend a heart warming graduation ceremony for 332 outstanding young Americans who had just completed six months of exceedingly challenging study at the Navy Nuclear Power Training Command. They join a long line of more than 110,000 people that have survived similar training during the past…