4 Comments

  1. Rod, you need to update the filmmakers on that scare ad about Shoreham that the oil people ran during the controversy over the plant opening. Or maybe you already have shown it to James. Talk about a smoking gun!

  2. Gwyneth – actually, James and Ray were the ones who found it and shared it with me. They discovered it during their library document searches.
    I think that the final product is going to be interesting and useful. Harvey and Karl do an excellent job of playing themselves and demonstrating the foolishness of their positions. You, on the other hand come off rather well as a person with critical thinking skills who is willing to change her mind when provided access to better information.

  3. Hi Rod,
    I’m a newbie to your blog. I was a consultant to (and former employee of) GE on the Shoreham Project after the ill-fated decision to not proceed beyond hot testing. The fuel had to be removed before complete decommissioning. We actually took the slightly irradiated fuel and made pioneering shipments of it by truck, barge and rail to the Limerick Station in PA for reinsertion and use. That series of shipments remains a model for the intermodal movement of this material. In this case there was a need to preserve the mechanical integrity of the assemblies since they were going back in-core in. I wrote a complete report on the entire operation for the DOE – OCRWM. Was a great project even though the demise of Shoreham was a huge waste.

  4. Robert – welcome to Atomic Insights and thank you for sharing your thoughts on Shoreham.
    It is definitely a story that continues to influence the progress of the nuclear industry; one of the reasons that it is difficult to finance a plant is that financial people in New York are aware of the fact that the plant was very contentious during construction, received its operating license, but was never allowed to operate and produce revenue to repay the loans.
    A large fraction of the financial industry is probably still personally writing checks every month in their electric bills to pay off those loans, even today.
    It is important for the nuclear industry to really understand what happened and why it happened so that they can avoid its recurrence.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Different nuclear points of view from New Zealand

    Stuff.co.nz published a story dated 8 September 2005 titled Energy minister says no to nuclear power. The occasion for the minister’s rejection was a response to a presentation by Murray Jackson, the chief executive of Genesis at a climate change conference that made a strong statement that nuclear power should be on the list of…

  • John Edwards – a candidate who needs some help with his math

    Last night I joined several hundred Washington DC residents at a bar at 1223 Connecticut Ave, paid my $15 donation, and listened to John Edwards explain his plan for leading America. I have a reasonable quality recording of the event that I plan to process and share via The Atomic Show feed, but that effort…

  • Smart people party

    After the award ceremony for the presenters and engineering challenge, after the speech by Mr. Luis Reyes, the Chief Operating Officer of the NRC, and after a fine Texas dinner of steak and potatoes, the American Nuclear Society Student Conference concluded with one last group event – the party. Luminant, the company that recently purchased…

  • James McKibben – Nuclear power is safest, cleanest, cheapest

    According to an opinion piece published on TheState.com (South Carolina’s Home Page), James McKibben believes that Nuclear power is safest, cleanest and cheapest energy source. I guess he is in the right job – his signed title is “Executive Director, Citizens for Nuclear Technology Awareness. Here are some of his points – little argument from…

  • Florida passes laws that will encourage nuclear development

    The Florida state senate passed a new energy roadmap with some provisions that may encourage electric power utilities in the state to speed up their development of new nuclear power plants. The bill passed through the senate on a 39-0 vote after having been approved by the House on Wednesday, 3 May on a vote…

  • Smooth Talking Coal King, Establishment Environmental Leaders, Politicians and Cap And Trade Fix

    Businessweek has published a fascinating article by Eric Pooley titled The Smooth Talking King of Coal – And Climate Change that should be required reading for anyone who is interested in understanding how business leaders, establishment Environmental group leaders, and ambitious politicians can come together to concoct a scheme to skew important rules to tilt…