• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Public Negotiations Over Plans to Tax Germany's Nuclear Plants to the Tune of 2.3 Billion Euros per Year

September 2, 2010 By Rod Adams

Germany’s utilities and major energy consuming businesses are taking the battle over special taxes into the public domain. They are refusing to be patsies for the politicians who are trying to frame the debate and tell the public that extending nuclear power plant operation is simply a gift to the plant owners. Though I do not speak German and am thus at a bit of a disadvantage in understanding the nuances, it seems that some of the government’s negotiators have indicated that the offer to allow extended operation can be taken away if the plant owners refuse to “do their share” to attempt to turn the wind and sun into reliable replacements for nuclear power plants.

Claudia Kemfert, DW Research Institute, made an interesting comment in reaction to the efforts of the utilities to bring the discussion about special nuclear power taxes to the public’s attention.

“The utilities try to avoid a tax simply because they increase the cost. Capital oriented companies, of course, would like to reduce the cost. And they would like to influence energy policy and pressure Chancellor Merkel.”

Can you believe the nerve of companies full of technically trained or educated energy specialists thinking they should influence future energy policy decisions? (End Ironic Commentary.)

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Soylent says

    September 2, 2010 at 8:02 AM

    The point of taxing carbon is to internalize the cost of CO2 emissions and benefit the plants that produce less CO2 per kWh at the expense of those plants that produce more. If these plants are more profitable, more will be built, that’s the whole point.
    So what does the German government do when nuclear predictably wins and ought to be thinking about expanding so they can shut down some of those old dirt burners? They say no, no, no, no, this is unfair; wind and solar was supposed to win!
    If that was the intent all along, just skip the middle man and skip the dishonesty of “playing market”. Just build state owned wind farms and solar farms and be done with it.

    • Jerry says

      September 2, 2010 at 8:55 AM

      You nailed it. It is a question of the DEGREE of control the government has over energy companies. When the government wants to put a price on carbon, that is a limited control mechanism, but it would still allow a free choice of technologies. In this case it however amounts to communist central planning. The government has an “plan” of certain technologies, is planning amounts of energy to be produced, planning the amounts of energy consumed by the citizenry, and then they intervene in the economy, adjusting profits and losses through subsidies and taxes, coercing business decisions by way of regulations, until the economy does exactly what they want them to do.

  2. arcs_n_sparks says

    September 2, 2010 at 8:30 AM

    This has less to do about nuclear power than it does about finding more heroin for politicians, their failed policies, and their welfare state.

  3. SteveK9 says

    September 2, 2010 at 9:37 AM

    Germany’s manufacturing-heavy, export-driven economy will pay a heavy price if the political decision to push solar and wind turns out to be a mistake — very likely.

  4. donb says

    September 2, 2010 at 10:17 AM

    The German government has set up a “damned if you do, and damned if you don’t” situation. The government says it wants electricity generated with greatly reduced CO2 emissions. Then when a company does it using nuclear energy, and even worse, has the audacity of making a profit while doing it, they either want to shut down the power plant (no license extensions) or tax it out of existance (nuclear fuel tax).
    Obviously, the German government is more interesting in picking winners and losers in the energy business than in reducing CO2 emissions.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Roger Clifton on Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Colin Megson on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Colin Megson on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Ed Leaver on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

The Assay TV speaks with Rod Adams, Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital and Atomic Insights host

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy