• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

More "Little Guys" Bragging About A Century of Natural Gas Supplies

November 3, 2009 By Rod Adams

Back on September 25, 2009, I wrote about a three part National Public Radio special about the U. S. domestic natural gas that portrayed the industry as a “mom and pop” enterprise made up of thousands of small companies with little political clout in Washington, DC. I expressed my skepticism about that portrayal at the time.

Just a couple of days ago, I wrote about the blitz that portrays “new natural gas” with a series of television advertisements based around “eureka” moments where everyday people learn something new about natural gas that leads them to believe that it is a good bridge fuel to the future. One of the facts that gets a lot of play is the recognition that new drilling technologies have enabled an increased reserve base, now computed to be 100 years “right here in the States” as one of the ad actresses claims. (See: New Natural Gas Commercials – Why Are They Bragging About a 100 Year Supply?)

Yesterday morning, in the bottom right hand corner of the front page of the Wall Street Journal, I noticed another example of the drumbeat being provided to both consumers and decision makers regarding the size of the US natural gas reserves. The obvious message here is that America can stop fretting about energy, after all, we have lots of this “clean, natural gas” to burn. Heck, it will supply current demand for 100 years! This new version of the message is brought to you by that tiny, powerless, “mom and pop” enterprise known as ExxonMobil. I am sure you have heard of that poor company, but did you know that its quarterly profits crashed by 68% in the most recent quarter, all the way down to $4.73 BILLION?

Please understand, I actually admire the engineering prowess that enables ExxonMobil to prosper and I am not opposed to profit. I just cannot stomach the notion that natural gas suppliers are politically or economically powerless and I cannot understand why anyone believes that the revelation that the US has enough natural gas to last us for 100 years – if we do not increase our consumption rate – is something that should discourage us as a nation from immediately seeking better, cleaner and more long lasting atomic alternatives.

Of course, it is not hard at all to understand why the companies running the advertisements want to slow down the search for alternatives – after all, what commodity supplier really likes competition from a cheaper, cleaner, more abundant rival?

Update: There is a half page editorial in today’s Wall Street Journal by Daniel Yergin, chairman of IHS CERA and author of The Prize: The Search for Oil, Money and Power (1991), one of the best books about the oil and gas industry I have ever read. Today’s editorial is titled America’s Natural Gas Revolution. It again attempts to explain why we should be so exited about 100 years of gas – at current consumption rates – and discusses electricity supply options without even mentioning nuclear power. Hmmmm.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Gordon Mcdowell on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Greg White on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Gerrit Bruhaug on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Eino on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy