5 Comments

  1. As much as I enjoy the enthusiasm of B&W for the Mpower reactor, being first to produce power is a real long shot.
    The competition has long since filed their design certification applications. The lead site for each of those designs have submitted their COLs.
    B&W has released a target of 1st quarter of 2012 for design application submittal (Not the 1st quarter of 2010 erroneously listed on the NRC web site). There is no reference site yet for an Mpower reactor (although TVA is considering it).
    A shorter build time can only do so much for catching up.
    Bill

  2. “A shorter build time can only do so much for catching up.”
    True, but easier financing might more than make up for that.

  3. ?A shorter build time can only do so much for catching up.?
    One of the favorite arguments of solar advocates is that it takes too long to build a nuke and that solar can come on line faster.
    If you take the capacity of the new nuke in being built in Finland (near the arctic circle) times the design CF times design life you get about 18,000 MW-years of generating capacity per year of construction.
    However, the plant is taking two years longer to build so now we are down to 13,000 MW-years of generating capacity per year of construction. On the positive side if the plant runs longer than designed we could get 20,000 MW-years of generating capacity per year of construction.
    Then I use the same method for my favorite utility scale solar PV systems and get 30 MW-years of generating capacity per year of construction.
    So no, you can not catch up bu building smaller.

  4. Kit, are years of construction fixed regardless of capacity? They might be, today, but you aren’t “thinking outside the box”. If someone came up with a nuclear power module that would be safe regardless of where it was sited, then construction could be as simple as pouring a concrete pad, putting the module on it, and hooking up the wires.
    You wouldn’t even need a license for the site, just a design that was NRC certified, and a module prebuilt to that design. All you’d need was 20 days, perhaps, not 20 years.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • BP's Alternative Energy vision versus Adams Atomic Engines's vision

    While catching up on some reading on The Energy Blog, I came across a post about a speech given on September 27, 2006 by BP’s Vivienne Cox. Ms. Cox was speaking to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council about her company’s investments in “clean electricity”. The speech is enlightening and I encourage you all to…

  • Vermont Health Department Reports One Leak Source Found at Vermont Yankee; All Samples For Isotopes Other Than Tritium are Natural Background

    The Vermont Department of Health has a well organized page detailing the results of the search for the source(s) of tritiated water leaks at Vermont Yankee. It includes regular updates, site maps and detailed sample results. Based on an update dated March 5, 2010, a remotely operated pipe inspecting vehicle has helped workers discover a…

  • What limits reactor fuel burnup?

    One of you – my loyal and fascinating readers – sent in the following question – So what is the burnup limit, and do operators currently burn fuel all the way to the limit? The question follows along with the previous post about the quantity of waste produced by pebble bed reactors and the subsequent…

  • Chevron's WillYouJoinUs project talks about nuclear power

    The current topic on Chevron’s well publicized WillYouJoinUs discussion on energy issues is “What role should nuclear power play in the world’s energy future?” The initial conversation features recycled columns by two well known commentators: Patrick Moore – Going Nuclear; A Green Makes the Case. Originally published April 16, 2006 in The Washington Post Amory…

  • William Tucker vs Jerry Taylor – Is Nuclear Power a Good Investment or a Risky Business Dependent on Government Subsidy?

    The Reason Foundation recently hosted a moderated discussion between William Tucker, author of Terrestrial Energy: How Nuclear Power Will Lead the Green Revolution and End America’s Long Energy Odyssey, and Jerry Taylor, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. In addition to the initial essays, Reason’s Out of Control blog hosted a continuing exchange titled…