Similar Posts

  • USA Today Opinion – nuclear deserves new look

    There is an interesting editorial debate going on the USA Today web site. The pro-nuclear view, posted on August 14, 2008 and apparently a product of the editorial board for the newspaper includes the following useful comments: It’s not that nothing could go wrong here, but the safety and security risks seem less ominous and…

  • Boston tea party anniversary

    Two hundred and thirty-four years ago, a group of colonists took action against a unilateral imposition of taxes by a distant government led by King George. Today, there are many liberty loving people who are remembering this event in a rather uniquely internet era way. You can find out more by visiting Tea Party 07….

  • Investor reaction to an aggressive plan for new nuclear power plants

    Here is a time to preach to the converted. During the past dozen or so years, I have engaged in a number of conversations with well-compensated executives in the energy industry. They have listened to my pitch about the technical benefits of nuclear power, but their closing remarks at the end of the meetings have…

  • MIT World – The Future of Nuclear Energy

    On March 1, 2007, the Technology and Culture Forum at MIT and MIT Student Pugwash hosted a three member panel to discuss The Future of Nuclear Energy. The panel members included Andy Kadak: Professor of the Practice of Nuclear Engineering, MIT Allison Macfarlane: Associate Professor of Environment Science and Policy at George Mason University and…

  • PSEG – Wall Street Journal advertisement touts nuclear as clean energy alternative

    I read a lot of business focused publications including Forbes, Fortune, BusinessWeek, and the Wall Street Journal. I also pay attention to print advertising in those publications – I blame (or perhaps a better word would be “credit”) Ms. Page, my tenth grade Semantics teacher. She taught us that the words used in advertisements are…