Similar Posts

  • Questioning the real risk level of exposure to radioactivity

    For many years, I have been involved in discussions with a dedicated group of scientists and engineers who question the basis of our current radiation control limits. According to the way that these people, mostly member of an organization called Radiation, Science and Health, interpret the results of hundreds of carefully conducted studies, the Linear,…

  • Wall St. Journal – Special section on energy – NO mention of nuclear

    I am a subscriber to the paper edition of the Wall Street Journal. It is a valuable source of information about the world of business. It has little in common with what people often refer to as “the liberal media”. Several times in the past couple of weeks, however, the Journal has featured stories about…

  • More Completely Unfounded CCS Assertions from "Energy Experts"

    The Guardian UK Observer has an article in the February 15, 2008 edition titled Coal at centre of fierce new climate battle. According to this article, some energy “experts” believe that countries like China and India are destined to burn coal in ever increasing quantities simply because it exists. But last week British energy experts…

  • Wall Street's Nuclear Caution

    The July 10, 2006 issue of BusinessWeek includes a commentary titled Nuclear Power’s Missing Fuel: Why Wall Street is skeptical of backing a new round of proposed nuke plants. As the column points out, there is a great deal of froth in the alternative energy technology market. Headline articles talking about ethanol, biodiesel, solar and…

  • Floating and submerged nuclear plants in the news in Norway and UAE

    It is getting increasingly obvious to oil exporting nations that nuclear power plants offer an intriguing investment opportunity. Russia recently inked a deal with Bulgaria to build a couple of new nuclear power reactors, investors in Alberta have been looking hard at using nuclear power in the oil sands region, and this morning I came…