Similar Posts

  • Feakonomics blog post about "Power to Save the World"

    The popular New York Times blog titled Freakonomics noticed the Wall Street Journal review of Gwyneth Cravens’s book Power to Save the World and produced a post on 21 November 2007 titled Do Not Read This If You Are Anti-Nuclear Energy. Apparently Stephen J. Dubner, the author of Freakonomics has been thinking and writing quite…

  • Opposing view

    Amory Lovins, of the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), one of the anti-nuclear industry’s leading mouthpieces has produced another diatribe against the use of the cleanest, cheapest, most abundant, and most reliable energy source available both now and in the immediate future. You can find this document at http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid1154.php. During the next couple of days, I…

  • Atomic power is a deeply spiritual issue for some people

    A friend of mine recently wrote a letter to Catholic Online in response to an opinion piece masquerading as an article. The piece was titled Canadian Catholic News: Nuclear energy called ‘a deeply spiritual issue’. The piece was an extensive rehashing of disinformation that has been spread for many years by Helen Caldicott, a professional…

  • Fighting Words in Florida – "Renewable" versus "Clean" Energy

    As a life-long lover of words, I enjoyed reading a PalmBeachPost.com article titled State’s green-energy future down to one choice: Renewable or clean?. It was a well-written piece that should help people understand just how important the battle over certain words can be. In this specific case, the difference between one word and the other…

  • Great visit to Michigan ANS chapter meeting – December 8, 2005

    Last Thursday night I had the pleasure of spending the evening with the Michigan chapter of the American Nuclear Society. Despite the cold and snow, there was a good turnout and I had the chance to speak to a number of friendly and interested people during the pre dinner attitude adjustment period. Following the dinner,…

  • USA Today Opinion – nuclear deserves new look

    There is an interesting editorial debate going on the USA Today web site. The pro-nuclear view, posted on August 14, 2008 and apparently a product of the editorial board for the newspaper includes the following useful comments: It’s not that nothing could go wrong here, but the safety and security risks seem less ominous and…