• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Don't trust headline writers

March 1, 2006 By Rod Adams

One of the rules that I have learned slowly over the years is that the people that write headlines have a very specialized skill that has its own set of rules. Their main job is to attract readers, not to provide information.

Many people that are critical of the news media do not understand that journalists almost never control the headlines chosen for their story and are often quite disappointed with the way that their publication chooses to “sell” their story. Unfortunately, they even get to field the angry correspondence generated by a headline that does not accurately reflect their efforts to provide accurate, balanced information. Almost an identical argument can be made about TV news, especially the local variety that is touted all day long with teasers that end with something like “more at 11”.

I ran across a great example of a headline that does not match the story very well. On 28 February 2006, the BBC web site published a story titled Ill health legacy of atomic bomb: People who survived the atomic bombs being dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 are still suffering health problems, a study reports.

The article then describes the study in more detail and reports that it was focused on issues affecting thyroids, a portion of the body that is known to be quite vulnerable to the immediate effects of releases of fission products. This vulnerability is the result of three natural factors that do not affect other organs – thyroids selectively absorb iodine, iodine-131 (with an 8 day half life) is one of the most common of the many isotopes produced by fission events, and iodine is a gas that readily disperses. Here is what the study showed:

Just under 45% – 1,833 – of those studied had malignant tumours, nodules [lumps on the thyroid] and cysts.

Those who were aged under 20 when the atomic bombs dropped had a higher risk of disease than those who had been older.

The researchers, led by Dr Misa Imaizumi, wrote in JAMA: “The present study revealed that, 55 to 58 years after radiation exposure, a significant relationship existed in the prevalence of not only malignant thyroid tumours but also benign thyroid nodules and that the relationship was significantly higher in those exposed at younger ages.

Based on my knowledge of the experiences of people very close to me, I know that thyroid nodules are pretty common and that people can live quite healthy and active lives long after diagnosis with these issues. Apparently, these issues have not proven to be fatal for the bomb survivors – after all, they are still alive sixty years after the bombs exploded.

So I kept reading to find out what kind of “ill health” these survivors had experienced. Here is the conclusion of the story:

“These conditions are rarely fatal, and some people with a thyroid cyst or nodule do not experience any symptoms.

“Therefore, it is difficult to collect information on the relationship between radiation exposure and the subsequent risk of thyroid disease that is free from any bias.”

I may be different from most people, but if I have a disease that allows me to live for sixty years without symptoms that are detectable without a detailed scientific study, I have a hard time considering that I might be experiencing “ill health”. I guess I am a bit weird, but I think that living without symptoms is a lot like living without a disease at all.

In other words, the journalist and the scientists involved in the study have done their job in informing the public, and the headline writer has done his job in getting me to read the story and then promote it to all of you. Don’t get upset by the headline; understand it for the purpose it is intended to serve.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Roger Clifton on Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Colin Megson on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Colin Megson on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Ed Leaver on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

The Assay TV speaks with Rod Adams, Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital and Atomic Insights host

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy