Similar Posts

  • Here's a Shocker – S. David Freeman Does Not Like Nuclear Power

    S. David Freeman, one of the most damaging energy policy makers of the 20th century is trying to make a comeback. For those of you who are not energy geeks, S. David Freeman served on the predecessor to the FERC under President Kennedy and worked on energy policies for both Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon….

  • Costs of "conservative" action

    On October 11, 2005, units 2 and 3 of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) were shutdown because the plant operators could not prove the validity of a calculation made in the 1970s when the plants were designed. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) challenged the plant engineers to prove that the Emergency Core Cooling…

  • Back from the UK

    My family and I just returned from a terrific coach tour of the UK and Ireland. I liked being a passenger; it gave me the opportunity to see a lot of the country. As people that know me might suspect, I paid a good deal of attention to the energy infrastructure that I could see…

  • Two Countries, Two Distinctly Different Energy Paths, One Crucial Lesson Learned

    I think I will let this one speak for itself. Thank you to Barry Brook at BraveNewClimate for sharing this brief video, created by his sister, Marion. Note: This video has been updated since the initial posting. Marion clarified a comparison that was challenged for mixing primary fuel consumption with electrical power consumption.

  • Asbury Park Press – Turn against coal means turning toward nuclear power

    According to an opinion piece titled Turn against coal leaves nuclear as power option written by James McGovern and posted on the Asbury Park Press (App.com), the recent flood of political decisions against new coal fired power plants indicates that nuclear power is the more palatable energy supply option. The article points to a big…