• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Cap and Trade is a Huge Mistake – Find Out Why Big Money Likes It And Why It Does Not Work

November 10, 2009 By Rod Adams

Steve Kirsch has recently published a guest post on Brave New Climate titled Fee-and-dividend is superior to cap-and-trade for effective carbon emissions reductions that does a better job than I have been able to do to explain my favorite solution to the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. (I called it a tax and return when I wrote about it in early October, but that is essentially the same concept as the fee and dividend. I think Steve is better at branding than I am.)

The post provides some excellent food for thought, and it also provided a link to a must-watch-and-share video that deserves to go viral. It is not amusing, does not capture animals doing silly things and may even be considered a little boring, but please take ten minutes out of your day and watch the YouTube video titled The Huge Mistake: Why cap and trade would be bad for the environment and the economy. It was produced by two career attorneys each with 20 years of experience in environmental law and regulation. It is thoughtful and well produced. (I fully expect a strong negative reaction from my favorite pro-coal troll, but that is the risk you take as the publisher of interactive media.)

Update: (Posted at 0452 on November 10, 2009) I just realized that Steve’s guest post on Brave New Climate is a condensation of an original that can be found at Why Hansen is Right: Cap-and-trade will Make the Climate Problem Worse, Not Better. Check that one out for even more information and an interesting analysis of why Joe Romm gets it wrong from both a scientific and political point of view. Here is a quote from his extensive post that explains what I like best about this approach compared to cap and trade:

In essence, it amounts to a net transfer of wealth from people who emit lots of carbon to people who emit less carbon. In other words, the money goes from people who can most afford it to people who can least afford it. Most importantly, unlike cap-and-trade, none of your money goes to Wall Street investors and none of your money flows out of the country. In fee-and-dividend, the money flows from US consumer to US consumer.

Additional Links

  • Carbon Tax Center
  • Carbon Fees: More Efficient Than Cap and Trade

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Eino on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Rob Brixey on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Jon Grams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy