Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 Comments

  1. Rod,

    Itunes isn’t showing episode #25, and it just doesn’t seem to exist as a downloadable mp3.

  2. The comment box does recognize URLs and HTML code so you don’t have to create the HTML file in your text editor.

    I find this (i.e. creating a small HTML file with the correct URL) a handy way of downloading an MP3 file if the provided URL is incorrect.

    Wayland

  3. Your Amarillo show was interesting, but you need to understand that the Texas Panhandle is not part of ERCOT, but is part of the Southwest Power Pool. Essentially, Amarillo was such an isolated place that when the grids were organized, it was not practical to put the old Southwestern Public Service (now Xcel Energy) into ERCOT. The water question may be bigger than you think: local conservation district rules require one acre of surface land to draw one acre-foot of water.

    As for streets named for Helium in Amarillo, there is only one, Helium Road, where one of the Helium plants was located.

  4. Greg:

    Thank you very much for your comment. This sheds a different light on the business opportunity since ERCOT and the Southwest Power Pool function with quite different market dynamics.

    I now need to do some additional research to figure out if the difference is beneficial to Amarillo Power or not. My sense, without detailed research is that the price for electricity is currently higher in ERCOT, but that the price there is quite volatile since it is tightly linked to the price of natural gas.

    Do you know how far the boundaries of the local conservation district extend? Are there areas within reasonably close proximity that have less water restrictions? I recognize that cooling is going to be one of the more interesting engineering and environmental challenges for this project.

    Rod

  5. Greg,

    Thanks for the correction concerning Helium Rd. I’d misheard that there were more streets around town carrying the name; I’ve seen the signs for Helium Rd. while turning around to get back to the restaurant row on the service road between Coulter and Soncy. Do you know if there are any museums in town focussed on the history of the helium extraction business there?

    Shane

  6. I am VERY concerned about the water usage for a nuclear reactor. The water would have to come from the Ogallala water aquifer which is already decreasing at an alarming rate. The only other water source is Lake Meredith which is at an all time low. If we need an alternative energy source, why doesn’t someone develope more wind farms and solar energy? We have plently of wind and sun around here and neither uses water. How much water would a nuclear reactor use in one day? shelia

  7. Your concern about water usage by a nuclear generating station is well-founded. Any steam generating plant, whether it is fossil or nuclear fired, requires a huge amount of cooling water. For example, the fossil-fired Harrington and Nichols plants; located just north of Amarillo, produce a combined fifteen hundred megawatts of electricity. They consume approximately twenty three million gallons of water a day. this water is reclaimed waste water from the city of Amarillo.

    The proposed 2700 megawatt nuclear station proposed to be located “in the vicinity of Amarillo” would consume as much as ten billion gallons of water per year; depending on the electrical output of the plant. “In the vicinity of Amarillo” the only source of water is the Ogallala aquifer, which is a finite source of water. The Ogallala is the life-blood of the Panhandle.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #197 – Radium, educational museums and Voices for Vermont Yankee

    On Sunday, February 24, I gathered a group of fission fans to talk about a number of nuclear energy related topics. We discussed Romance of Radium and how perceptions about radiation have been molded over the 76 years since it was produced. Then, people had learned enough about the benefits of using power emitted from…

  • The Atomic Show #022

    During episode number 22, Shane and I begin with a rant about people like George Monbiot, the author of a recent article titled Sure, nuclear power is safer than in the past – but we still don’t need it. Our big beef is that he accepts a fossil fuel industry supported notion that it is…

  • The Atomic Show #154 – Atomic Round-up With Five Experts

    Rod Adams got together with Margaret Harding, Dan Yurman, Meredith Angwin, and Charles Barton for a round up of recent atomic industry and technology developments. Topics discussed included new enrichment facilities, enrichment technology, public meetings about new nuclear power plants, and small reactor plant developments. Meredith Angwin is a physical chemist with long experience in…

  • The Atomic Show #019 (MP3 – 16.3MB – 47min)

    This week Shane and I talked about recent nuclear developments in Canada, about the Ontario energy plan, and about technical choices and opportunities in the nuclear energy business in Canada. We discuss the potential use of CANDU technology for tar sands oil production and the potential use of SLOWPOKE reactors for district heating systems. During…

  • The Atomic Show #51 – Uranium – interesting history and politics

    We’re back after a couple of weeks off. The atomic geeks chat about uranium, which has an interesting history in politics, discovery and economics. Uranium is as common as tin and can be found in measurable quantities almost anywhere in the world. Its price often varies by several hundred percent over short periods of time,…