Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. I am no expert but some thought about plausible DNA repair suggests that dose rate is the important factor, not total dose. Since everything in molecular biology is always more complex than first imagined, I suppose total dose might eventually matter as well.

    Still, I suspect that success of DNA repair is primarily dependent upon low enough dose rate.

  2. Logically, it also leads to questioning whether “lifetime dose” has any useful meaning.

  3. I live in Pasco and would have loved to attend!!! Had no idea…..and I WORK at a Nuclear Power Plant. Of course I was on duty Saturday-Tuesday, but I would have looked into taking time off to attend.

    We are having a INPO and WANO visit right now and its JUST as terrible as it sounds. Cant believe the Nuclear Power Industry has allowed these morons to gain this much power and influence. Not one single plant has the balls to put them in their place.

Similar Posts

  • Coal ash needs proper regulation and enforcement

    Occasionally I run into people who are opposed to nuclear who tell me that they fight it because we do not need the power. They forget that about 35-50% of the electricity in the United States comes from burning as much as 1.1 billion tons of coal per year. It is important to me that…

  • NRC calls off expensive search for witches

    On September 8, 2015, the NRC announced that it would stop funding the National Academy of Sciences’s (NAS) five-year-long, multimillion dollar effort to create a method that could be used to study whether or not populations that are exposed to radiation doses that are a tiny fraction of average background radiation related to proximity to…

  • Fukushima Happened. Now What?

    In the months and years to come, post-Fukushima, people who influence power plant construction decisions will be making choices that will have a large impact on future generations. In this reflective time of the year, it is important to gather the most accurate lessons learned and to offer some food for thought about the motives…

  • Another update on “highly radioactive” water leaks at Fukushima

    The media frenzy about the detection of water leaks from the vast tank farm that Tokyo Electric Power Company has been forced to build to store water used to cool the three damaged cores at their Fukushima Daiichi power station continues to sizzle, even in the face of the potential for US attack on Syria….

  • Realistic dose limits and better predictive models will help Fukushima recovery

    World Nuclear News published an article titled Consistency required for Fukushima return that mentions several topics worth increased discussion. It mentions the report recently completed by the IAEA that complimented Japan on its efforts to decontaminate areas that were affected by the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station radioactive material releases. Then it went on to…

  • Presentations from NAS BEIR VIII Planning Meeting Posted

    On November 17, 2014, I attended a meeting at the National Academy of Sciences building in Washington organized to determine if there is a need to convene an eighth committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VIII). The presentations given during that meeting have been published on line at Planning Towards the BEIR…