14 Comments

  1. Rod, is your purpose for posting this to see how many smoking guns this fund might end up turning up?

  2. I was curious as to how many law suits does the former chairman have against him and who brought the suits. I can find no information regarding who or what organization is suing him personally. If the suits are against him as the Chairman then his defense would be handled by the gov. So can you shed some light on where this money is going? I believe it is illegal to raise money under false pretense so it would be good to know:
    1. How many suits have been brought
    2. The subject of the suits
    3. Who or what organizations have brought the suits
    4. What is the estimated cost to him personnally for his defense

    Thanks

  3. Rod,

    As I have stated before this is a scam. If any lawsuits occur following actions he took while NRC Chairman, the Government or NRC will have to defend him.

    This is how things are done in most occidental countries when high ranking officials are sued due to actions they took while in the exercice of their duties. The government contributes to paying the fees.

    I am sure it is the same thing in the US. But correct me if I am wrong.

  4. As far as I know, the former Chairman does not face any lawsuits. The legal expenses were incurred as a result of him hiring counsel to provide advice during the IG investigations of his professional performance – or lack thereof.

  5. I would say that this should have already been provided by the NRC legal department since it was in the course of his duties.

    These ‘counsels’ were provided while he was on duty ? It makes no sense to me that he would require outside help. But then again I could be totally wrong.

  6. The only question remains, which anti-nuke Washington think tank will ask him to share his “expertise”?

  7. Based on the above discussion we have know way of knowing how much, if any, costs the Chairman has incurred in his ” defense “. This looks like a great way for Sen Reid to use PAC money to pay off his former aid for political favors for which the DC Court of appeals is calling illegal. Why hasn’t the media picked up on this very dark chapter in our government’s senior elected officials manner of doing business? The NRC is the last government agency the ciizens of the US should ever allow to become politicized.

  8. Unfortunately, the behavior of someone like Mr. Jaczko has become more and more common in Washington, D.C. as the crony politics of people like Harry Reid spread their fetid stink across the landscape. The NRC should only be staffed with true technical experts, not the puppets of politicians.

  9. Fukushima is an example of the nuclear industries safety that was tested by nature and did not hold up well at all. Is there any NPP sites tested to the past area maxamum natural desaster and survived to show us how safe they are designed for the area. If so it would give the public asurance of the safety. Looking forward to see them. Thanks.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • The Atomic Show #135 – Tom Sanders – President, American Nuclear Society

    Tom Sanders took office as the President of the American Nuclear Society on June 18, 2009. Rod Adams spoke with him on the day before. Tom explained his goals for the year, the importance of nuclear technology to national security and the enthusiasm that he has for “right-sized” reactors. Podcast: Play in new window |…

  • Mark Jacobson pushing his plans in appropriate location – late night comedy show

    On October 9, 2013, David Letterman interviewed Mark Z. Jacobson, a leading proponent of a 100% renewable energy future. He described Jacobson as a man with a plan that should make us all more optimistic; that plan describes a world that has a completely changed energy supply system that does not threaten us with catastrophic…

  • Is Bill McKibben really serious about climate change?

    Andy Revkin recently published a post on his Dot Earth blog titled A Communications Scholar Analyzes Bill McKibben’s Path on Climate. In one of the videos that is embedded in the article, Matthew Nisbet describes Bill McKibben as a public intellectual and compares his activism on climate to that of Rachel Carson on the effects…

  • Bernie Sanders is listening to the wrong people about energy

    Many of my friends and colleagues in the nuclear energy community think I’m am on a quixotic mission. Though I have not made any decision on how to vote in November, Bernie Sanders is the candidate who is currently delivering messages that align with my thoughts on the direction that the US needs to move…

  • Jaczko hearings a depressing example of partisan power politics

    I am a deeply disappointed supporter of many Democratic platform planks who strongly believes in protecting the environment, building a strong educational system that is freely available to all comers, enabling workers to earn a decent wage for their hard work, increasing the number of jobs available to all residents of the United States, building…

  • Energy versus Power – Energy delivered rapidly equals power

    A BusinessWeek article titled Putin $14 Billion Nuclear Deal Wins Over Russia Critic Orban recognizes the importance of recent Russian power deals to supply gas, oil, and nuclear energy facilities. There is widespread confusion about energy versus power. Conversations about the business of selling hydrocarbons or electricity are described as being about energy, but the…