Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 Comments

  1. If they could paint-camouflage cooling towers to melt in with the skies or surroundings it’d be a worthwhile aesthetic and local-property values enhancing endeavor. Never liked the monstrous things, whose looming alien looks helped contribute to and stereotype TMI’s ominous image of otherworldly peril to the point that some unusually clueless reporters (WCBS/WABC-TV) during that period actually reported that the cooling towers WERE the reactors! Vermont Yankee’s more subtle scenic-friendly method is the PR way to go!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  2. Ironically enough, here in Britain almost no nuclear power stations have cooling towers (as they use seawater cooling instead) but lots of fossil fuel power stations have them…

  3. A while back I asked on my Facebook page “nuke roadie ” if the ironic cooling towers were attracting negative attention to nuclear plants. There is a plant in my area called ginna that has no tower and seems to fall under the radar so to speak , the overwhelming consensus was that nuclear should not have to hide the fact that it is there. I still believe that the cooling towers have a negative connotation,fueled by the media and they should be retired in favor of a less “in your face ” system. Any aesthetic improvements can not hurt either. Make them an attraction ,paint them with murals ,make them something to be enjoyed and maybe some of the stigma attached to them might fade.

  4. How about a little Andy Warhol and covering the cooling towers with Cambell’s Soup can labels.

  5. Maybe paint it to look like a red brick wall and let ivy grow on it – call it a green project! Or just paint the ivy on it. More crass option – sell advertising space on it.

Similar Posts

  • Furious About Fossil Fuel Funded Fukushima Frenzy

    Throughout the past week, I have gotten increasingly angry as I read more and more drivel coming from the establishment about how the lessons of March 11, 2011 should result in our society turning its collective back on nuclear fission power production. According to countless pundits, the events that took place on that day –…

  • Atomic Show #263 – Musicians choosing to be atomic advocates

    Forgive me, dear readers and listeners. It has been more than two months since my last post and more than 11 months since my last Atomic Show podcast. It has been a refreshing pause in my atomic information sharing activities. I haven’t been completely separated from the fray. I’ve been keeping up with my reading…

  • Robert Stone talks with Michael Moore at the Traverse City Film Festival

    During the summer of 2013, Robert Stone, the director of Pandora’s Promise, was invited to show his documentary at the Traverse City Film Festival. Michael Moore, one of the most famous and financially successful documentary film makers in America, is the founder and president of the festival. After the showing, the two directors chatted about…

  • Exaggerated myths about nuclear accidents CAUSE negative health effects

    This video was produced by the World Nuclear Association (WNA). It shows that the predicted health consequences of nuclear accidents are often orders of magnitude greater than the actual, measured health consequences of the accidents that have occurred. Instead of the “worst case scenarios” of hundreds of thousands to millions of people getting sick and…