• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Sierra Club’s Long-Time Executive Director and Soon To Be Chairman Marketing Natural Gas At Clean Energy Summit 2.0

August 16, 2009 By Rod Adams

It is becoming apparent that the establishment Environmental community has made its bed with the natural gas industry. In the above video, you will see and hear Carl Pope, the long time Executive Director of the Sierra Club and its future Chairman, extolling the virtues of natural gas. He talks about how abundant it is in America, how it produces 50% of the carbon dioxide compared to burning coal in a power plant to create electricity and how it is a viable substitute vehicle fuel in heavy trucks and automobiles. (Note: It is debatable to assert the ratio of CO2 released by gas versus coal as a fixed number since there are several other factors that must be considered including the efficiency of the generator, the distance that the fuel must be transported, and whether or not the gas is imported in the form of LNG. )

Pope’s talking points are virtually identical to the ones issued by the American Clean Skies Foundation (ACSF), which receives essentially all of its income from the natural gas industry. Though there are people that want to draw a bright line between natural gas and oil in the collective mind of the public, the physical reality is that gas and oil often come out of the same hole in the ground, they are extracted and processed by the same companies, and they are, in fact, both similar compounds with somewhat different lengths in their hydrocarbon chains. There are even places in the world where natural gas is “upgraded” to become oil for transportation purposes in a process called “gas to liquids”.

When people label themselves as “Environmentalists” and spend their professional lives telling others that their behavior in trying to live comfortable lives is somehow wrong, it is a bit strange to see them touting the benefits of a fuel that is very similar to the one they criticize. After all, would IBM get praised if their manufacturing process for transformers had put only 50% as much PCB into the Hudson?

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Managing member at Nucleation Capital, LP.
Atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. Financial, strategic, and political analyst. Former submarine Engineer Officer. Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast. Resume available here.

Please subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #288 – Per Peterson, CNO, Kairos Power

Kenneth Pitzer blamed AEC advisors for slow power reactor development

Why did the US Atomic Energy Commission kill Daniels Pile in 1947?

How did an oil shale investor hamstring his atomic energy competition? (Ancient but impactful smoking gun)

Improved atomic energy offers a pathway that Princeton’s Net Zero America failed to acknowledge

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy