• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Numerous energy industry leaders indicate a desire for federal climate change action

November 26, 2006 By Rod Adams

The Washington Post published an article on November 25, 2006 titled Energy Firms Come to Terms With Climate Change. According to the authors of the article, more and more American energy industry leaders are accepting the notion that emissions of climate changing gases like carbon dioxide are going to be regulated. Even companies like Exxon-Mobile seem to be shifting from questioning the science surrounding the global warming hypothesis to figuring out effective ways to respond to the challenges imposed by both governments and technology.

One scenario that seems to have pushed the energy leaders into their strategic course change is the notion of widely varying state and local regulations. Most large companies can deal with regulations. In fact most of them actively encourage their representatives to impose regulations – complex regulatory environments favor large companies over more nimble competitors since they can more readily afford to employ teams of lawyers and compliance officers. What scares large, geographically distributed companies is a situation where there are a myriad of local laws – the economies of scale disappear when each location must be treated differently.

Another factor that has changed active resistance into resigned acceptance is the change from a Republican to a Democratic Senate and House of Representatives. The general feeling is that the Democrats have more supporters than Republicans who favor increased emissions regulations.

My position on the matter is that it makes sense to take action to reduce pollution – not just to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide. Though I freely admit that I regularly use the common atmosphere as a waste dump that enables my own personal consumption of energy benefits from burning diesel fuel, wood, gasoline, and (indirectly) coal, I would prefer if we humans could take actions that would move us closer to a zero emissions regime.

In my book, that means that power plants that are clean enough to run inside sealed submarines should receive some favorable consideration in future planning scenarios.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Managing member at Nucleation Capital, LP.
Atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. Financial, strategic, and political analyst. Former submarine Engineer Officer. Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast. Resume available here.

Please subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #288 – Per Peterson, CNO, Kairos Power

Kenneth Pitzer blamed AEC advisors for slow power reactor development

Why did the US Atomic Energy Commission kill Daniels Pile in 1947?

How did an oil shale investor hamstring his atomic energy competition? (Ancient but impactful smoking gun)

Improved atomic energy offers a pathway that Princeton’s Net Zero America failed to acknowledge

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy