• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

More time reading than writing today – India, Texas, Vermont, South Carolina, and Neo-Cons

February 13, 2009 By Rod Adams

I have spent the last few hours reading some interesting, sometimes detailed articles about nuclear power in India, Texas, Vermont and South Carolina. I also re-read a thought provoking article about how the neo-cons “killed” nuclear power. Though the author of that article used the word “killed”, I think she would agree that it is too strong of a word; more accurately, the neo-con effort has successfully slowed fission’s march toward energy market domination, but it is far from dead.

Unfortunately all that reading has not left me with much time to write. Instead, I guess I will just share the links with a few comments.

India – If you are interested in a comprehensive summary of some of the investments, opportunities and politics associated with new nuclear power developments in India, I highly recommend brewing a fresh pot of coffee and sitting down to read the article titled New Energy: Nuclear Deals Mushroom in India published by India Knowledge at Wharton. It is a great read and makes me want to fire up eTrade to do some additional research on all of the unfamiliar and familiar names mentioned.

Texas – Austin, Texas has a love-hate relationship with nuclear power. It loves the low marginal cost power that it currently gets from its 17% stake in the South Texas Project, but it continues to struggle with whether or not to participate in the STP expansion. You can read more at Austin poised to reject nuclear-plant expansion. Note: the headline writer got it wrong. Austin is not deciding anything about the nuclear expansion; the only decision is whether or not to invest in the project. I expect that it will move forward with or without Austin’s help. Also in a Texas related story, it looks like NRG continues to reject Exelon’s hostile takeover bid. The company seems to be doing quite well without the big brother that would come as a result of a takeover.

Vermont – For some odd reason, Vermont’s Public Service Board continues to play a brinksmanship game with Entergy regarding a license extension for Vermont Yankee. If you peer deeply between the lines, you will find that the underlying motive seems to be a desire to force a better rate deal with the company. Can anyone help me to understand why Vermont has any say in whether the plant gets a renewed license to operate? I thought that was a federal decision.

South Carolina – Reuters is reporting that the governor of South Carolina has publicly criticized a proposed coal fired power plant because it would release noxious pollutants, exposes the state ratepayers to unknown cost risks as a result of proposed restrictions on CO2, and could be made unnecessary by the development of nuclear nuclear power plants. I like that kind of thinking.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Eino on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Rob Brixey on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Jon Grams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy