• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Google worried about power costs – they need atomic engines

December 11, 2005 By Rod Adams

CNET News published a story on 9 December 2005 titled Power could cost more than servers, Google warns.

A Google engineer published an article in the September issue of Association for Computing Machinery’s Queue. He warned that power might eventually cost more than the hardware itself, which is quite a concern for an organization with as many “boxes” as Google has in its infrastructure.

Luiz Andre Barroso, the Google engineer, is agreeing with Apple computer’s Steve Jobs, who talked earlier this year about the importance of “performance per watt” as a metric of good microprocessor design. Mr. Barroso used to design chips for Digital Equipment Corporation and probably focused part of his efforts on improvements to this aspect of chip performance.

A complimentary technological path might also be an effort to reduce the cost of electricity, so that the total cost of operating whatever chips the industry can design goes down. In an era with high oil, coal and natural gas prices, atomic fission using heavy metals (uranium, thorium and plutonium) is one available path for that kind of development. (I am sure that you are shocked to see me write that.)

Today’s operating nuclear power plants in the United States have average operating costs of approximately 1.65 US dollar cents per kilowatt hour. In contrast – at Friday’s closing price of $15.02 per million BTU (Henry Hub on the NYMEX) for natural gas – a gas fired electrical power generator has a fuel cost of about 12 US dollar cents per kilowatt hour.

That comparison is actually quite biased against nuclear fission – the fission power plant O&M cost includes ALL operating costs including decommissioning cost contribution, labor, fuel, maintenance, and waste storage. The gas power plant cost from above includes JUST FUEL and it is still more than 6 times as high!

In California, the land of fruits, nuts, and technology companies like Google, more than 60% of the electricity is produced in power plants that burn natural gas and the state has a law that prevents building new nuclear power plants until a “final” solution to spent fuel storage is implemented by the federal government.

No wonder Google engineers are so concerned about power consumption.

Since they are very smart fellows, perhaps they should recommend to their company executives that the company consider deploying some of its assets into companies that are focused on developing lower cost, simple, reliable, atomic engines that can turn standard electrical power generators. IMHO, a prime candidate would be:

Adams Atomic Engines, Inc.

Disclosure – I am the same Rod Adams that founded Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. in September 1993 and I remain the President of that tiny company.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • paul wick on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy