• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Frank Zarb, Ford Adminstration Energy Czar, recommends nuclear power

May 27, 2007 By Rod Adams

Frank Zarb was the pragmatic energy advisor to President Ford during the period between the Arab Oil embargo and the Iranian hostage crisis. It was a period when plenty of people were thinking hard about how to reduce America’s vulnerability to petroleum supply disruptions caused by uncontrollable events in unstable areas of the world. On May 23, 2007, Mr. Zarb published an op-ed piece in the New York Times titled How to Win The Energy War.

He starts off by claiming that the Ford Administration had some good ideas about how to improve our energy supply system and make us less dependent on imports. Here is what the plan included

“Within the next 10 years,” he announced, “my program envisions 200 major nuclear power plants, 250 major new coal mines, 150 major coal-fired power plants, 30 major new refineries, 20 major new synthetic fuel plants, the drilling of many thousands of new wells, the insulation of 18 million homes and the manufacturing and sale of millions of new automobiles, trucks and buses that use much less fuel.”

Ford’s prescription did not please anyone, but it would have worked well in its objective of increasing energy supplies and improving American security. Partly as a result of the courageous plan, but mostly as a result of frustrations over his decision to pardon Richard Nixon, Ford was defeated in the 1976 elections and the plan was never implemented.

Aside: I have some sneaking suspicions that the first plank in the plan was a big part of his downfall. Have you ever really thought about how much emphasis was placed on Jimmy Carter’s nuclear training during the campaign and how quickly his administration moved to reduce American confidence in nuclear power developments? As I have said several times before, it really makes one wonder especially if you realize that Jimmy Carter knew less about nuclear power than I did when I was an ensign fresh out of the classroom phase of nuclear training. (See Picking on the Jimmy Carter Myth for a history of Jimmy Carter’s Navy nuclear training.) I want to make my thinking on this matter clear and understandable – I believe there is a good chance that Carter’s handlers wanted people to believe that he knew a lot about nuclear power. They wanted to make that a part of the campaign so that when he expressed his personal doubts about atomic energy, those doubts would appear to be well founded and cause others to shy away from seeing nuclear power as a solution to some very pressing energy supply problems.

Now back to Mr. Zarb’s opinion piece – he apparently still likes that first plank in the Ford energy plan that emphasizes the importance of building new nuclear power stations. Here is what he said on that topic:

The other major way to wean us from oil is to resume construction of nuclear power plants. Nuclear energy is the cleanest and best option for America’s electric power supply, yet it has been stalled by decades of unproductive debate. Our current commercial nuclear power plants have an outstanding record of safety and security, and new designs will only raise performance. How can Washington help? One thing would be federal legislation to streamline the licensing of new plants and the approval of sites for them.

The basic elements of a responsible energy policy are not complicated, but the politics are horrendous. Still, we can’t continue to throw empty rhetoric at the issue, using the oil companies as political punching bags and relying on our troops to keep the oil flowing.

I knew there was a reason why I liked the Ford Administration!

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Eino on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Rob Brixey on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Jon Grams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy