• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Constant Exposure: How Much Radiation is Normal?

May 1, 1995 By Rod Adams

Everyone on earth is continually exposed to radiation. It comes from the certain isotopes of carbon and potassium in the food we eat, from cosmic radiation, from radon gas and from the decay of naturally occurring uranium, thorium and their decay products.

Radiation: A Part of Daily Life

There is a wide variation in the amount of natural background radiation. Your personal exposure is a function of where you live, what you eat, whether or not you smoke, how your house is constructed, how much time you spend in airplanes and how many medical procedures involving x-rays you undergo.

Since radiation is a natural component of our environment, it is rather logical to assume that our bodies have developed ways of coping with levels within natural variations.

How Your Body Reacts

Numerous studies have indicated the accuracy of this assumption. Seven states in the western United States have background radiation levels that are 50-100 percent higher than the national average. The death rate from cancer in those states is 15 percent lower than the national average.

In a 20 year study of a population of 25,000 in China, half of which were from an area with twice the background level that the control group experienced, the cancer death rate was slightly lower in the high background area. In a 35 year study of a population of 70,000 people in India with average exposures from background radiation that are three times higher than the world-wide average, no statistically significant health effects were found.

A Japanese study involving more than 7 million people found no correlation between increases in background radiation exposure and increases in health effects.

Both logic and evidence support the assertion that people in general have nothing to worry about if their routine radiation exposure varies within a factor of as much as three from the world-wide average.

How Much is Too Much

The following table summarizes recent estimates of the doses from the various sources of radiation. (mSv/yr)

SourceBritainUS
radon1.32.0
gamma from rocks0.350.28
materials in food and drink0.30.39
medical procedures0.30.53
cosmic radiation0.250.27
miscellaneous0.010.09
fall-out (incl Chernobyl)0.010.0006
occupational exposure0.0050.009
nuclear plants0.0010.0005
totals2.5 mSv/yr3.5 mSv/yr

Here is the kicker. The people designing nuclear fuel storage areas are required to show that no member of the population will receive in excess of 0.25 mSv/yr under a worst case release scenario. Billions of dollars are being wasted in an effort to protect us from a radiation source that would add less than 10 percent to the natural dose for the most exposed person.

Filed Under: Atomic Insights May 1995, Health Effects

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Gary Nicholls on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Jon Grams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Eino on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • James R. Baerg on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy