• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Bulgaria May Respond To European Gas Crisis By Restarting Nuclear Power Plants

January 8, 2009 By Rod Adams

As a result of the gas supply crisis in Europe, Bulgaria has announced the start of activities to begin producing electricity from Kozloduy 3, a 405 MW reactor that was shut down in 2006. The reactor has been purposely maintained in a condition that would allow it to be restarted within approximately one month if the country determined that its power was required. Kozloduy 4, an identical reactor, is also available if necessary. A 405 MWe reactor is roughly equivalent to 2 million cubic meters (75 million cubic feet) of natural gas per day.

Bulgaria is one of the countries that is most affected by the shut off of natural gas from Russia into Ukraine and thus into most of the European natural gas supply system. Until Bulgaria began its quest for accession into the EU, it operated six nuclear power plants (Kozloduy 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 – all Pressurized Water Reactors – Russian VVER models) at a site that had hosted nuclear plants continuously since 1974. The six units produced more electricity than the country needed, so it was a net exporter of power to many of its neighbors.

Because the reactors were built to Soviet standards, rather than Western standards, Bulgaria invested a large amount of money and effort into upgrading all of them and installing modern safety equipment. That effort enabled the country to continue operating the reactors and supplying most of its internal electrical power needs plus some of the needs of its neighbors, but the effort was not good enough for the European Union.

As enticement to shut down the reactors, the EU paid Bulgaria 200 million euro and promised accession to the EU if it would shut down units 1 and 2 in December 2002. Upon further negotiation, shutdown dates in 2006 were agreed upon for units 3 and 4 with an additional payment of 300 million euro. The Bulgarians were quite reluctant; they believed that the upgrades installed in units 3 and 4 had made the reactors fully compliant with IAEA standards, and the IAEA agreed. From Nuclear Power in Bulgaria

Then in 2003, after a 2-week scrutiny by 18 international inspectors, the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) reported that units 3 & 4 met all necessary international standards for safe operation. This confirmed the earlier IAEA report. WANO said that after more than a decade of safety upgrades on units 3 & 4 in line with IAEA recommendations: “operational, seismic and design safety at Kozloduy now corresponds to the level of improvements seen at plants of similar vintage elsewhere. Many of the safety measures adopted for these plants in the design, operation and seismic areas exceeded those that were foreseen.”

The EU refused to renegotiate the previously signed agreement and established a position that prevented Bulgarian accession without shutting down the reactors. Bulgaria really wanted to become a member of the EU so it reluctantly shut down two well operated and maintained pressurized water reactors and became far more dependent on burning natural gas to produce electricity.

My hope is that once Bulgaria begins operating Kozloduy 3, it will start up Kozloduy 4 and operate both plants through the rest of their useful lives. It would be a good outcome of the crisis.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Managing member at Nucleation Capital, LP.
Atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. Financial, strategic, and political analyst. Former submarine Engineer Officer. Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast. Resume available here.

Please subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

How did an oil shale investor hamstring his atomic energy competition? (Ancient but impactful smoking gun)

Improved atomic energy offers a pathway that Princeton’s Net Zero America failed to acknowledge

Adams Engines™: Design Concepts

Will heavy nitrogen become a widely used fission reactor coolant?

Is there a conspiracy against nuclear energy?

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy