2 Comments

  1. When you read the articles, it is worth noting that David O’Brien, Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Public Service (DPS) often comments on Roper’s articles.
    One thing that I would like to see made more explicit, however, is that the Board of Directors set-up for the Clean Energy Development Fund CEDF didn’t exist at first. The geeks at the DPS were running the CEDF show with a small bipartisan oversight panel. When the ARRA funds approached and the amount of money in CEDF was about to increase dramatically, Shumlin and cronies decided the geeks at DPS shouldn’t run CEDF any more. It was time to put together their own Board to run CEDF. They happily included people on the board who would make the rules about how to apply for CEDF funds and THEN…apply for the funds themselves. Haven’t you ever noticed how much easier it is to win government money if you start by writing the government rules for “how to win”?
    I recommend this August article on the situation, also by Emerson Lynn.
    http://www.vermonttiger.com/content/2010/08/there-must-be-a-better-way.html
    I am someone who used to work in renewables and I believe renewables have a place at the table. I hate to see this kind of behavior. I hate it as a taxpayer, and I hate it as someone who respects renewables.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Eastern European progress and policy about nuclear power

    Sometimes I get frustrated (I know, those of you who actually know me will be shocked, shocked I tell you, to hear that) by the lack of understanding that Americans display about events in other countries. We are a pretty insular people and often fail to understand what drives those events to occur. In particular,…

  • Lithuania’s desire to operate nuclear power plants

    Several days ago, in my initial post about the Russian-Ukrainian gas dispute, I alluded to the fact that the European Union leaders must accept some of the blame for the Europe’s growing vulnerability to aggressive use of easily interrupted natural gas as a political weapon. I made a comment that deserves some follow-up. Here is…

  • Great Opinion Piece About Chernobyl and the LNT

    Joshua Gilder, a visiting fellow at the Lexington Institute, published a terrific opinion piece in the October 25, 2005 issue of the Washington Times titled “Chernobyl exposed.” He correctly identifies that the biggest cause of health effects from the accident was the fear that was instilled into the population based on ignorance and misguided government…

  • Pragmatic view of the Nuclear Renaissance from Dr. Moniz

    Dan Rather interviewed Dr. Ernest Moniz as part of an in-depth look at nuclear energy, its future prospects in the United States and its current technological position. Dr. Moniz is a professor at MIT, was one of the co-chairs of the study group that produced MIT’s recent report titled The Future of Natural Gas and…

  • Participating in nuclear discussions of opportunity

    Though it has been a few days since a full new post here, I have not been slacking off. Instead, I have been spending some quality time engaging in some interesting, possibly rewarding and sometimes frustrating discussions in the expanding universe of nuclear related discussions. I even managed to spend some time in real, face…

  • A new phase in my nuclear career

    Model of mPower™ inside containment As regular Atomic Insights readers know, I gained some of my atomic insights as a commissioned officer in the US Navy. I served for part of my career as an engineering officer on board nuclear powered submarines and gained an up close and personal appreciation for the amazing technology that…