• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

WIPP

Norbert Rempe – Radiation Superstitions discusses costs of LNT and ALARA in DOE cleanup activities

August 22, 2015 By Rod Adams

Atomic Insights is not standing alone in the effort to push people and agencies to take a hard look at the basis for current radiation assumptions and regulations. Please watch Norbert Rempe, a retired professional geologist who spent much of his career performing work associated with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, describe some of the costs and dangers associated with treating even the smallest measurable doses of radiation as hazardous.

Rempe played a supporting role in a story published by Current Argus News in February titled WIPP: 1 Year After the Accident.

In terms of safety, some would say that the fire was far more dangerous than the low-level radiation release.

Norbert Rempe, a retired geologist who worked at WIPP for over 20 years attends most WIPP meetings and openly criticizes WIPP officials.

Rempe has several concerns, including that WIPP and DOE officials still haven’t given a good estimate of the actual radiation still present in the underground.

“If you need to clean up a mess, you need to establish the size of the mess,” Rempe said.

Rempe said that what happened during the fire was far more dangerous then the radiation leak.

“These were my former colleagues who were potentially in danger, and it, the fire, could’ve caused a lot more damage then the radiation leak,” Rempe said. “Safety is their number one priority, but improving nuclear safety, for nuclear, trumped everything.”

Rempe explained that when the fire occurred, the ventilation system in the underground was shifted as if it were a radiological event, an act that made smoke inhalation more of an issue during the fire.

During his presentation, Rempe makes a number of important points about the costs associated with trying to enforce radiation protection limits that are a small fraction of the variations in normal background exposure around the world. He identifies an iron quadrangle of interest groups that benefit from excessive spending to clean up places that are already clean enough to prevent hazards to humans. They benefit because they are the recipients of the spending; they are on the revenue side of double entry accounting systems where one entity’s costs become another entity’s revenues.

It’s a lengthy presentation, but the slides are good and the delivery is informative and wryly amusing.

Filed Under: Atomic politics, Contamination, LNT, Pro Nuclear Video, WIPP

WIPP Fire – Accident Investigation Report

March 18, 2014 By Rod Adams

On Wednesday, February 5, 2014, a salt-hauling truck in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) caught fire when flammable liquids (either diesel fuel or hydraulic fluid) in the engine compartment contacted hot surfaces, most likely the catalytic converter. Though the fire filled much of the underground with smoke, all 86 workers underground at the time of the fire safely evacuated.

Six people were treated at a local hospital for smoke inhalation; seven more workers were exposed to damaging doses of smoke but they treated on site without being transported to the hospital.

The Accident Investigation Report has been completed and can be downloaded from the WIPP web site.

One of the major contributing causes was inadequate vehicle preventative maintenance. The accident investigation team noted a significant difference between the vehicle maintenance programs for vehicles used to move nuclear waste and those used to move more mundane materials like salt. WIPP has a strong nuclear safety culture, but the mine safety culture that should be a part of any underground industrial activity needs to be improved.

That is an all too common situation in the nuclear world. Because of the extremely tight rules and standards applied to all activities directly associated with nuclear materials, activities in areas that seem unrelated to nuclear materials often receive less attention.

One of the truths about all human endeavors is that you cannot make everything a “top priority.” Another is that there is a finite amount of time and resources available to any organization. The more focus and prioritization a group of people places on isolated portions of its activities, the more other portions suffer due to incorrect resource allocations.

The salt haul truck fire shows that activities that are unrelated to nuclear materials can have very serious consequences, especially in a confined, underground space. Fortunately, no one was hurt during the process of learning the lesson that mine safety needs more emphasis.

Putting more emphasis on mine safety means one of two things. Either DOE needs to provide more resources to the WIPP project or some of the resources the management at WIPP currently directs towards striving for perfection in handling nuclear waste need to be spread a little more evenly.

Here is a little more food for thought and perhaps an interesting conversation.

The airborne contamination event at WIPP that has been previously covered (see related posts below) resulted in virtually unmeasurable doses to humans and no measurable surface contamination outside of the mine. Though it was unrelated to the fire, it happened nine days later.

Carlsbad Mayor Dale Janway made the following statement in a letter to his community titled WIPP: The Right Location for TRU Waste published in the March 2014 issue of Nuclear Nexus.

But there was a radiological incident at WIPP on Feb. 14. Radiation was detected in the WIPP underground and trace amounts of americium and plutonium were detected above ground. WIPP’s monitoring and filtration system kept almost all of the material from getting into the air above ground, and right now there’s still speculation as to what happened in the underground.
…
I don’t want to diminish in any way what happened at WIPP. This has been absolutely the most serious incident in the 15-year history of the project.

He was referring to the airborne contamination event, not the fire. I suspect that most people would agree with Mayor Janway, but it is worth wondering how we arrived at a point where a fire that threatened the lives of 86 people and required 13 people to receive some form of medical attention is considered to be “absolutely” less serious than a minor release of radioactive material in an uninhabited mine.

Filed Under: Accidents, WIPP

Event at WIPP is newsworthy but not dangerous

February 27, 2014 By Rod Adams

It has been almost two weeks since a continuous air monitor alarmed at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Though no one was hurt and no one is likely to be harmed in the future, an irregular drip of information interrupted by periods of silence has gradually painted a picture of a serious event worthy […]

Filed Under: Contamination, Health Effects, Nuclear Communications, WIPP

Airborne radiation at WIPP

February 20, 2014 By Rod Adams

Update: A reader pointed out that the headline is inaccurate. The issue at WIPP is airborne contamination (by radioactive material), not airborne radiation. In order to be gentle with search engines and existing links, the headline will remain as is. End Update. On Friday, February 14 at 11:30 pm, a continuous air monitoring alarm went […]

Filed Under: Contamination, isotopes, Radiation, WIPP

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #288 – Per Peterson, CNO, Kairos Power

Kenneth Pitzer blamed AEC advisors for slow power reactor development

Why did the US Atomic Energy Commission kill Daniels Pile in 1947?

How did an oil shale investor hamstring his atomic energy competition? (Ancient but impactful smoking gun)

Improved atomic energy offers a pathway that Princeton’s Net Zero America failed to acknowledge

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy