US Energy Information Agency releases annual projection

ByRod Adams

The US Department of Energy’s Energy Information Agency has posted its early release of Annual Energy Outlook 2006.

In recognition of major changes in the energy markets since last year there are several significant differences in what the agency calls its base case. World oil production is expected to grow at a slower rate than previously projected, with total production in 20 years more than 10% lower than projected last year. Essentially all of the difference comes from OPEC. Last year the EIA thought that OPEC members would be supplying 55 million barrels of oil per day by 2025, now, just one year later the projection for the same year is only 44 million barrels.

There are a number of assumptions underlying the projections, but one possibility is that suppliers like high oil prices and will keep their projection in check in order to keep them there. An alternative explanation that results in essentially the same projection is that reserves are smaller than previously assumed and production restrictions are a natural result of increased difficulty in recovery.

Other differences in the annual report include the fact that the base case includes 6,000 MW of capacity (with an assumed capacity factor of about 90%) from new nuclear electric power plants by 2025, in addition to approximately 3,000 MW in new capacity from power uprates in currently operating plants. Last year’s report included the following statement:

“No new nuclear units are expected to become operable between 2003 and 2025.”

A third major difference in the report is a one third reduction in US LNG imports by 2025. Last year’s report projected that the number would be 6.4 Trillion cubic feet, this year’s number is 4.1 Trillion cubic feet. The difference is explained by increasing world natural gas prices caused by the fact that other countries are increasingly converting from coal to cleaner burning natural gas and are increasing their gas to liquid (GTL) fuel production in response to higher oil prices.

What a difference a year makes.

Rod Adams
Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Similar Posts

  • Assessment of External Costs And Emissions of Various Power Sources

    ByRod Adams

    One of the studies that I find a need to quote from on a regular basis is the ExternE study of life cycle costs and emissions that shows just how much (or how little) external costs can be attributed to the production of a kilowatt-hour of electricity from a whole range of fuel supplies and…

  • Prime Example on Why The US Department of Energy Rarely Produces Any Energy

    ByRod Adams

    Discover Magazine recently published an article with interesting information about next generation nuclear power plants that contains all of the information that you need to know about why the US Department of Energy is one of the largest employers of scientists in the country yet rarely succeeds in its title mission of providing tools that…

  • Trip down atomic memory lane

    ByRod Adams

    One of the reasons that I have chosen to use the word “atomic” vice the word “nuclear” on my blogs, web sites, and in my company’s name is to evoke memories of an era when people were optimistic about energy from “the atom”. There was a time when nearly everyone agreed that atomic fission was…

  • Dave Roberts says he found "The final nail in the pro-nuclear argument"

    ByRod Adams

    I found another interesting post titled The final nail in the pro-nuclear argument by my old “friend”, Dave Roberts over on Gristmill. (See Interesting discussions on Grist for links to our last discussion.) Of course, I could not let Dave forget that there are people who disagree with his stance against nuclear power, so I…