Quotes about nuclear opposition #1

ByRod Adams

I am learning to play with a new tool – Google Book Search Beta. Though I have some concerns about Google’s treatment of authors and their copyrights, I am excited by the prospects of being able to do serious research from my home office. Until today, I did not realize just how many obscure, but important information sources would be opened up by this project.

For example – the US Government and its agencies are prodigious publishers of technical information and political history. Those works, created by people working for government paychecks, rightfully belong in the public domain.

University press books, especially those that have been long out of print, also hold great promise as sources of information that may change the world if the contents become readily exposed to the sunshine provided by excellent search engines.

As many of you may know, I have been searching for years for tidbits of evidence to back up my frequently repeated assertions that at least part of the opposition to nuclear power is a well funded enterprise that has – rather logically – been supported by a variety of fossil fuel interests.

Therefore, one of my first uses of Google Book Search was to look for some evidence to support this notion.

Here are some quotes, with references – I expect that I will continue this effort for some time to come, with occasional posts on this web log.


“The coal lobby, which was nuclear power’s only organized national opponent until the late sixties, felt it had more to lose from a battle over potential health risks than the nuclear community. When the Atomic Industrial Forum arranged a December 1963 meeting with the National Coal Association, the coal lobby suggested that both sides cease discussing health hazards. The Coal Association was “willing not to bring up the health and safety problem in the future” if the Forum would agree to do the same.” (Balogh, p. 261)


“Since nuclear power was so competitive, some politicians asked, why were large federal subsidies required? Why, asked the coal lobby, did the Atomic Energy Commission, despite billions of private investment dollars flowing into commercial nuclear power, insist that nuclear power had no “practical value”?” (Balogh, p. 309)


“The only significant corporate opposition to nuclear promotion came from the coal industry. It was muted by the sector’s political weakness deference to national security, and perhaps the hope that very cheap nuclear power could allow coal resources to be used as feedstock for syn-fuel and the chemical industry.” (Cohn, p. 28)

References:
Title: Chain Reaction
Author(s): Brian Balogh
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication Date: Nov 26, 1993
Subject: Politics / Current Events
Format: Paperback
Pages: 352
Dimensions 6.10 x 8.92 x 0.79 in
ISBN 052145736X

Title: Too Cheap to Meter
Author(s): Steven Mark Cohn
Publisher: SUNY Press
Publication Date: Oct 1, 1997
Subject: Sociology
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 467
ISBN 0791433897

I think I might have found a couple of books to add to my library.

Rod Adams
Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Similar Posts

  • Debating Nuclear Energy in Malaysia

    ByRod Adams

    I am still fascinated by the way that the World Wide Web opens up an entirely new way to understand the way the world works and thinks. Of course, my own view is limited by time and by the fact that I only speak English, but it is amazing that I can be rapidly made…

  • Dr. Gregory Jaczko – Nuclear Regulation in an Era of Growth and Change

    ByRod Adams

    If you happen to be near Stanford University this afternoon – May 18, 2010 – and have some free time between 4:15 and 5:15, visit building 420, room 40 to hear the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission give a talk titled Nuclear Regulation In An Era of Growth And Change. Here is a summary…

  • Mother Jones Blue Marble blog takes on the nuclear debate

    ByRod Adams

    The Blue Marble blog has an interesting concept going that will be worth watching. You might even want to participate. Here is their description of the idea as described on a post dated April 27, 2008 titled Pro-Nuke? Anti-Nuke?: Pro-Nuke? Anti-Nuke? Talk About It With The Experts We asked a futurist, a MoJo writer, a…

  • Recommended reading about Iran

    ByRod Adams

    Iran is a complex and diverse country that is portrayed in a very negative light in many US publications. It has also been the subject of many confusing and bellicose statements by US government leaders for many years. However, with very few exceptions, Americans have little first hand knowledge of the people or the country…

  • McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act

    ByRod Adams

    The nuclear industry is pressing hard for assistance for the initial expenses of introducing a new generation of nuclear power plants in the US. A new bill introduced last week by Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman provides some of the requested assistance, motivated by the fact that nuclear power does not produce any greenhouse…