• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Question from a reader – Difference in material between reactors and weapons

March 14, 2006 By Rod Adams

One of my favorite readers is a high school science teacher from Kansas who blogs at Lone Pony. She recently sent me an email asking for my opinion on some recent articles about Iran. We thought it would be worth sharing the exchange publicly, so here goes.

Question

One of my concerns is the ignorance of people (myself included) in the difference in the material used in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons.

These articles caught my attention today:

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/03/12/iran.nuclear/

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060312/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear

Am I correct in assuming one of the reasons this might not be acceptable to Iran is because they know the uranium they will receive would be only slightly enriched? Also, that it is not capable of sustaining the chain reaction necessary for a nuclear weapon?

Just in case the articles referenced disappear from the web and the links are broken by the time you read this, the topic for both articles is a failure in recent negotiations between Iran and Russia for Russia to provide enriched uranium fuel for reactors to Iran in exchange for Iran giving up its indigenous enrichment program.

Atomic’s Answer

Though Iran has some troubling characteristics and its leadership is not what Americans would choose, it is a sovereign nation with a long and distinguished history. Its government is even democratically elected, even if the political system is quite different from ours.

Iran’s leaders are correct in asserting that the country did not give up its rights to independently develop nuclear technologies for peaceful use when they signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In fact, that treaty specifically protects and encourages the rights of signatories to develop atomic power for non weapons applications.

The politicians that assert that only low enriched fuel is useful for power are ignorant about the technology. Higher enrichments make smaller reactors possible and directly reduces the quantity of highly radioactive left over materials. Both of these characteristics make enriched fuel particularly appropriate for developing nations or countries that do not already have an established nuclear power industry based on reactors producing 100s of Megawatts.

The idea of America trying to force a sovereign, democratic country to depend on Russia for supplies of a useful commercial product is hard to digest for an unrepenting Cold Warrior like me. If you look back in archive issues of Atomic Insights Blog, you will find a number of entries talking about Russia’s very recent use of fuel supplies to influence the politics in their former client states.

I would hate to see a major regional power like Iran forced into a position where their decisions could be strongly influenced by a country that has never given up its desire to be a major power with significant interests in limiting freedom and democracy.

Something tells me that there will be some additional questions to follow. Please join in if you have some of your own.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Avatar

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #291 – Kalev Kallemets, Fermi Energia

Preliminary lessons available to be learned from Feb 2021 extended cold spell

South Texas Project Unit 1 tripped at 0537 on Feb 15, 2021

Atomic Show #290 – Myrto Tripathi, Voices of Nuclear

Change is in the wind: Commencing a new phase as a Venture Capitalist

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy