• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996

In the News: Oct/Nov 1996

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

Cost of Nuclear Power Phase Out

(September 13, 1996 Source- NucNet) – The authors of a recent study titled, “The Importance of Not Phasing Out Nuclear Power in Sweden” estimate that the direct cost of prematurely shutting down all 12 nuclear power units would be about 250 billion crowns (more than $35 billion). The figure is based on the assumption that all lost nuclear capacity would have to be replaced, and that the economical lifetime of a nuclear unit is at least 40 years. In indirect cost terms, a political decision to close down all 12 units by 2010 would result in electricity prices for industry doubling sooner or later.

Even if that increase did not take place immediately, its effect on industry would be immediate, because of the need for long-term investment planning. For many industries, especially in the pulp and paper sector, annual profit is currently less than the annual cost of electricity. The study assumes that the increase in electricity prices would thus lead to large scale closing or relocating of important industries with an associated loss in jobs, gross national product and tax revenue.

Job Losses at British Energy

(October 9, 1996) – The privatized nuclear power company British Energy PLC said Wednesday it will eliminate nearly a quarter of its jobs over three years, and a union leader expressed concerns about safety. British Energy said that by axing 1,460 jobs — leaving the total work force at about 4,800 — it can save $78 million a year.

Although chief executive Robert Hawley said the drive to cut costs will come “against a background of never compromising on our total commitment to safety,” a top union leader voiced his doubts. “The company will have to convince us that our members working inside the power stations and those living in communities around them will in no way be placed at risk because of the lower staffing levels,” said Danny Carrigan, national officer for the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union.

Carrigan called the planned job cuts a “kick in the teeth” to workers who had helped turn the company around economically.

$1000 Billion Worth of Coal Put Off Limits

(September 20, 1996) – President Clinton has created a controversial National Monument, which locks in an estimated 7 billion tonnes of low-sulphur coal, said to be worth up to US$ 1000 billion. The 700,000 hectare Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in the Utah desert includes coal leases which were to become a 6000 hectare underground mine exporting to East Asia. The leases, on Federal Government land, are not revoked but the new designation means that Washington will impose restrictions which prevent mining. The action does not require Congressional approval.

Filed Under: Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996

Sources for Atomic Energy Insights Oct/Nov 1996 (PM-3A)

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

Sources for Atomic Energy Insights Oct/Nov 1996
(PM-3A)

Foster, M. E.,Jones, G. M., History of the PM-3A Nuclear Power Plant McMurdo Station, Antarctica, Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity, Port Hueneme, CA

Final Operating Report for PM-3A Nuclear Power Plant, McMurdo Station, Antarctica, Prepared by U. S. Naval Nuclear Power Unit, P. O. Box 96 Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060

Filed Under: Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996, Technical History Stories

Valuable Tool for Antarctic Research or Costly Waste?

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

Before the discovery of nuclear fission, the only power source capable of supplying reliable electrical energy in remote locations was a combustion engine. Because of its compact nature compared to a coal fired steam engine, the internal combustion engine was the power system of choice. When engineers realized that a fission power plant could operate […]

Filed Under: Army Nuclear Program, Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996, Small Nuclear Power Plants, Technical History Stories

A Question of Economics: The Answer Depends on the Assumptions

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

In 1970, President Nixon affirmed that the United States had long term objectives in the Antarctic regions and consolidated responsibility for management and funding of all Antarctic operations under the National Science Foundation. According to the new arrangement, the NSF was to take over the funding of PM-3A as of July 1, 1972. At the […]

Filed Under: Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996, Small Nuclear Power Plants, Technical History Stories

How Clean is Clean? Blasting Out Frozen Soil

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

The final disposition of the soil was to spread it out on the ground and cover it with asphalt, turning the expensively gathered Anarctic soil into a parking lot that continues to serve the sailors at Port Hueneme, California. After the decision was made to decommission the PM-3A, the Naval Nuclear Power Unit began planning […]

Filed Under: Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996, Small Nuclear Power Plants, Technical History Stories

Letter from the Editor: PM-3A, Pioneer in Anarctic Research

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

Recently I took my family to the Tampa, Florida Museum of Science and Industry (MOSI), which had a traveling exhibit on Antarctica. The display included a great deal of information about the dedicated explorers and unique wildlife indigenous to that remote land with one of the harshest climates on earth. Several of the exploration groups […]

Filed Under: Army Nuclear Program, Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996, Small Nuclear Power Plants, Technical History Stories

PM-3A Design and Construction: Rapid Pace to Fulfill a Need

November 1, 1996 By Rod Adams

The U. S. Navy began intensive involvement in Antarctic research missions during 1955 in preparation for the International Geophysical Year. The Department of Defense assigned the Navy the responsibility of maintaining and supplying the logistical needs of permanent research stations located in Antarctica. The assignment was based on the fact that the Navy had the […]

Filed Under: Army Nuclear Program, Atomic Insights Oct/Nov 1996, Small Nuclear Power Plants, Technical History Stories

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Gary Nicholls on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Jon Grams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Eino on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • James R. Baerg on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy