Letter from the Editor: A History of Success

ByRod Adams

The United States Navy submarine reactor program has a record of achievement and respect dating back to the early 1950s. In a field full of failed projects begun with high expectations, the Naval Reactors program is worthy of admiration and study. In this issue of AEI, we will focus on several early technical decisions that played a large role in shaping the nuclear power industry.

Rickover

There was never any doubt who was in charge of the Navy’s nuclear reactor program. Hyman G. Rickover, despite his diminutive physical presence, made it quite clear to everyone within shouting distance that he was the man who could turn paper ideas into functioning nuclear engines for ship propulsion. From March 1946, when he was first assigned to study nuclear technology at Oak Ridge, until his forced retirement in 1982, Rickover’s name was synonymous with navy nuclear power.

“Beyond Competition” Technology

Rickover picked what might be called a “killer app”, when he decided to use a submarine as his vessel for the first nuclear propulsion plant. (In computer lingo, a “killer app” is an application that makes a new technology so useful that it is worth the effort and expenditure required to switch from older machines.)

Unlike combustion, nuclear fission does not require oxygen. Uranium also has about two million times as much energy per unit mass as oil. Those two characteristics made the potential advantages of nuclear power for undersea vessels overwhelming. The idea of being able to produce an engine for a sub which could run at high power without oxygen for an indefinite period of time was too important to ignore.

Even with the huge technical advantages, Rickover had to work steadily for more than four years just to gain the high level commitment he needed to create the program. Starting a revolutionary technological program is never easy.

Dogged Follow-Through

Several AEI issues have asked the question, “Why no follow-through?” Obviously, in the case of nuclear submarines, follow-through has been a strength rather than a missing element. Since the Nautilus first reported “Underway on nuclear power” on January 17, 1955, American shipyards have produced nearly 200 nuclear submarines. These submarines have logged more than 100 million miles of operation in some of the world’s most remote areas and in some of the most harsh environmental conditions on the earth.

In the earliest days, Admiral Rickover and his organization struggled to overcome many technical barriers, any one of which might have stopped the program. By gathering some of the most talented and dedicated engineers available and by motivating them with the notion that they were doing something of vital importance, Rickover built an almost unstoppable team.

By making decisions and sticking to them, he avoided the expensive changes in direction that plagued failed efforts like the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Program. By demanding excellence, he made sure that his engines worked as he said they would.

The nuclear submarine program is not perfect and never has been. This issue of AEI, however, is about the program’s early technical decision points and how they contributed to the long term success of the program.

Rod Adams
Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Similar Posts

  • Pressurized Water: Best Choice for the 1950s Subs

    ByRod Adams

    When Rickover first began studying nuclear technology, he found a program in severe disarray. The Army’s Manhattan Project had accomplished its mission of completing a workable bomb before the end of the war. Many of the key scientists and engineers had left the program, eager to leave the security restrictions and poor working conditions behind….

  • In the news: December 1995

    ByRod Adams

    Watts Bar Receives Low Power Licence (November 11, 1995) TVA’s Watts Bar nuclear power plant has been under construction for more than 23 years. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has just approved a permit that will allow the Tennessee Valley Authority to begin loading it with fuel for low-power testing. The fuel has been stored in…

  • Technical Hurdles: One Step at a Time

    ByRod Adams

    Though water was chosen partially because it was a familiar fluid for power engineers, the choice almost doomed the nuclear submarine program. Laboratory testing of the pumps, bearings, valves, and piping demonstrated to Rickover’s team that the simple, familiar fluid was not so simple at high temperatures and pressures, particularly when exposed to neutron radiation….

  • Protection for Fuel Elements: Ensuring Saftey

    ByRod Adams

    Once Rickover’s team selected water as their primary reactor coolant, other material criteria became readily apparent. Though pure water at room temperature is a relatively benign environment, water at high temperatures is quite corrosive. Because radioactive fission products can be dangerous to human health, prudent reactor designers must devise methods to ensure that the fission…

  • Controlling Power: Temperature and Rods

    ByRod Adams

    Pressurized water reactors turned out to be extremely stable power producers. Because of the fact that water is used to moderate the energy level of neutrons, making them more effective in causing fission, the concentration of water in the core is an important part of determining the reactivity of the core. Temperature control An increase…