• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Decommissioning Oyster Creek would hurt Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey

February 18, 2006 By Rod Adams

I wrote a letter to the author of a 16 February 2006 article from the Asbury Park Press titled “Closing Oyster Creek would be anything but simple.”

The article told its story mainly from the point of view of people that were fighting the license renewal process and talked about things like stopping the production of more used fuel and the complex and expensive procedure required to dismantle the plant.

In fairness the article did mention that the plant owner already has the cost of decommissioning in the bank, since putting away that money is part of the licensing requirement. Here is my full letter, which is probably a bit too long for publication in a traditional letter to the editor section.

Dear Mr. Clunn:

In your article titled “Decommissioning Oyster Creek would be anything but simple” you did not mention an important detail that will affect all residents of the Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland electrical interconnection region. If the plant shuts down in 2009, the power that the plant now produces will have to be replaced by burning more oil or natural gas. There is little likelihood that any other kind of power production can be brought on line by that time.

In 2003, the last year that Energy Information Administration data is available (http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/reactors/oyster_creek.html) the plant operated at a capacity factor of 98.9% and produced more than 5.2 million megawatt-hours of electricity.

Replacing that power would require about 24,000 barrels of oil every day, the equivalent amount of natural gas or some combination of the two. If fuel costs remain the same as they are today, that would cost ratepayers about $525 million each year in additional fuel surcharges. It is more likely that the increased demand for those limited fuels would drive the price even higher.

The additional air pollution from burning that additional fossil fuel would also be shared by all of the region’s customers. Oyster Creek produces zero SOX, NOX, CO2, mercury or fly ash. As air pollution flies, Oyster Creek is about 50 miles from my Annapolis home and has a beneficial effect on the entire Delaware and Chesapeake Bay watersheds.

The review process that the NRC uses is very detailed. If the plant operators are able to prove to the NRC that the plant has been well maintained and meets its safety criteria, the plant should be allowed to operate for at least an additional twenty years. Its benefits greatly exceed its costs.

Best regards,

Rod Adams
Editor, Atomic Insights
www.atomicinsights.com

Related Posts

  • 95% disagree with "Beyond Nuclear". Let's make it 99%

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Roger Clifton on Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Colin Megson on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Colin Megson on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Ed Leaver on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

The Assay TV speaks with Rod Adams, Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital and Atomic Insights host

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy