2000 Words About Quitting Coal From the New York Times – Only Tiny Mention of "Nuclear"

ByRod Adams

Melanie Warner wrote a 2000 word article for the business section of the New York Times titled Is America Ready to Quit Coal, that was published online on February 14, 2009. (There is also a note on the article that indicates that a version of it appeared in the print edition on February 15, 2009 on page BU1.) The article focuses on the challenges faced by utility companies like Duke Energy to build new coal fired power plants. In Duke’s case, its large Cliffside project is being subjected to protests and court challenges.

The article also describes a $100 million dollar carbon capture and storage research and development project at American Electric Power’s Mountaineer Power Plant in West Virginia. That project has some thought provoking numbers associated with it. The Mountaineer plant, rated at 1300 MWe, currently emits more than 8.5 million metric tons of CO2 each year from its 150 foot tall smokestack. By using a chilled ammonia process developed by Alstom, AEP hopes to capture and store 100,000 to 300,000 metric tons of CO2 (1.2 – 3.5% of the total) annually. If that project is successful, AEP may install a larger system at another power plant. According to the information brochure about the plan published by the company, that system, not yet designed, may capture as much as 1 million metric tons of CO2 each year and be ready for operation by 2012.

As I read through the Times article, I kept losing focus by wondering when the author or one of the half dozen or so high level influencers mentioned would use the “N” word. I continued to expect that someone would say that a number of utilities, including Duke Energy, are planning to avoid the challenges of carbon regulation and carbon capture and storage technology development and demonstration by building fission power plants that do not emit any CO2 at all. After all, this article is in the business section, the place that people with money to invest visit with great regularity for news about policies, technologies and developments that affect the bottom line.

After completing the article the first time, I had to resort to search technology to see if I had missed sometime. According to Safari’s search on this page option, I had. It told me there was one occurrence of “nuclear” on the page, in the following context:

Others have even broader ambitions. Dan W. Reicher, Google’s director for climate change and energy initiatives, is confident it’s possible to wean ourselves off coal. Last year he devised a plan, called Clean Energy 2030, that calls for America to go almost fossil fuel-free by 2030.

His proposal entails keeping electricity demand flat by aggressively pursuing energy efficiency, thus bypassing the need for new coal plants to meet growing demand. All existing coal generation and about half of our current natural gas production would be replaced with a medley of clean electricity propelled by wind, solar, nuclear and other sources.

So here we have an article published on the front page of the Sunday business section by a publication that likes to assert that it is our newspaper of record that is all about a major challenge in electrical power production but it mentions nuclear power only in a sentence where it is listed third as an alternative after wind and solar.

We have a lot of work to do. Fortunately, there are some voices and keyboards that are working hard to share a business focused message about the opportunities for prosperity and development offered by investing now in clean power plants that will last 60-100 years into the future and provide huge and continuing benefits. You might enjoy, for example, a recent op-ed piece by Lynn Edward Weaver, president emeritus of the Florida Institute of Technology, published in the Orlando Sentinel on February 15. That piece, titled Nuclear power will bolster the economy, offers some impressive numbers.

At least New Yorkers on vacation at Disney World have a chance to come home with a better understanding of the investment potential in new nuclear power plant construction than they would have received if they stayed home in their apartments and spent Sunday morning reading the Times.

Rod Adams
Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Similar Posts

  • Misguided Colorado resident

    ByRod Adams

    There is a letter to the editor that was published on colorado.com on July 11 titled Nuclear Power: Boon or bane that needs some response. The people from Fort Collins deserve to learn from people know a more about the subject. Unfortunately, I have very limited time today. Any takers?

  • A couple of interesting PBMR updates

    ByRod Adams

    For those of you who are interested in the current status of the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) there have been a couple of useful articles published in Creamer Media’s Engineering News in the last few days. The first one, titled Life beyond nuclear electricity for PBMR talks about applications for PBMRs that are outside…

  • Britain is ready to go nuclear

    ByRod Adams

    In an article titled Britain is ready to go nuclear published in the The Times on 21 November 2005, Philip Webster is reporting that Britain will start the process of planning and building new nuclear power stations. The most often cited primary motivator for this decision is the fact that many scientific advisors have determined…

  • Atomic Show Number 61 – Interview with Dr. Allison MacFarlane, Atomic Agnostic

    ByRod Adams

    Last night I had an interesting chat with Dr. Allison MacFarlane. She is an Associate Professor of Environment Science and Policy at George Mason University and a research associate of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs’ Project on Managing the Atom at Harvard University. She also co-authored Uncertainty Underground: Yucca Mountain and the…

  • Balanced discussion of California electricity supply

    ByRod Adams

    InsideBayArea.com has published an important article by Sarah Jane Tribble titled A dark horse for alternative energy that gives a good overview of the current discussion that is starting to occur in California about future energy supplies. I highly recommend that you visit the article and enter into the conversation – the site takes comments….