Aspen Institute’s Panel Discussion on American Energy Leadership
…wrong then and continue to be wrong now. As I said then, it is absurd for Sovacool to admit that Storm-Smith was flawed and controversial and yet still include it, along with several derivatives of it, in a meta study that excludes inputs just because they are not academically “peer-reviewed.” Do you think that reviews by regulatory bodies and internal reviews to ensure numerical accuracy and methodology legitimacy are somehow less stringent than…