Nova’s “Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail”

On July 29, 2015, a week before the August 6 commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, PBS (Public Broadcast System in the US) aired a documentary titled Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail. Unlike many efforts on similar topics, this one is worth watching. More importantly, it is worth recommending to family, friends, acquaintances, students and strangers.

Though there is a heavy focus on the destructive power of atomic bombs — logically enough, considering the calendar hook with the Hiroshima anniversary — there is also excellent information about nuclear medical technology, the health effects of radiation, the importance of nuclear energy in any effort to reduce fossil fuel CO2 emissions, and the innovations currently being explored by people like Leslie Dewan and Mark Massie of Transatomic Power.

The show is narrated by Derek Muller, a young and engaging physicist turned science communicator. Derek is famous on the Internet for his Veritasium: An Element of Truth YouTube channel. You might not have heard of Muller, but his 2.7 million subscribers have provided his channel nearly 200 million views in the five years it has been available. As evidenced by his selection as the star of Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail those are numbers that make network producers take notice.

The show includes segments with Professor Gerry Thomas of the UK’s Imperial College, Leslie Dewan, and Bionerd23 who all provide important information about radiation and nuclear energy.

It shouldn’t surprise anyone to find out that I don’t agree with all aspects of the production. After all, I don’t agree with 100% of the material that I wrote more than a few months ago.

My key disagreement with Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail comes near the end of episode 2 when Muller provides a summary of his journey.

The entire story of uranium is perhaps one of measured risk.

When I began this journey to understand uranium, I had to wear this badge everywhere I went. It measures my cumulative exposure to radiation. I’ve worn it here, among some of the largest uranium deposits on earth [scenes from Australian outback], where the uranium is actually woven into the creation story of the people who have lived here for thousands of years.

And I’ve worn this badge into places where people may never live for hundreds of years [Chernobyl scenes]. I discovered how we took uranium, and one morning 70 years ago in the New Mexico desert, we unleashed the power of the dragon. [Quibble – The event he’s describing was the plutonium bomb test at the Trinity site.]

We launched ourselves into the nuclear age.

[Embedded movie scene] Men being what they are, wouldn’t it really have been better if this thing hadn’t been invented?

Of course you’re right Mr. Benson. The energy in the atom is the most destructive force the world has ever seen. It can also be one of the greatest blessings God has ever given us. Which is it to be? Because on that depends the future of mankind. [End movie scene]

So, what should we do with uranium? As a physicist, I’m tempted to say it’s such a great source of power. It has such incredible energy density. It has so many benefits that way. How can you ignore it?

But after studying it, after searching the world and following the story of uranium, the feeling that I’m left with is that it’s not ready to take over. And seeing how far renewable energy has come, that suggests to me that there are alternatives these days and that we don’t need to go with uranium. We don’t need to risk another place like this.

[Note: Above was said while showing scenes of devastation caused by Great Northeast Japan tsunami and earthquake along with the incorrect political decision to force people to leave homes in a lightly contaminated area. The “place like this” was not caused by a nuclear accident or the effects of releasing a limited amount of radioactive material.]

In my opinion, it doesn’t sound completely consistent with the rest of the documentary and tends to ignore the known hazards of all other technologies that can perform similar tasks. Despite all marketing material to the contrary, “renewable energy” is fundamentally unreliable energy and incapable of replacing fossil fuel power sources.

Fortunately, Muller’s final soliloquy doesn’t end with his statement that we do not need uranium.

And yet every year, uranium treats disease and every year saves more lives than it ever destroyed, even including the atomic bombs. And just imagine a world where next generation reactors could produce massive amounts of clean, safe energy. We live in an age where the nuclear dragon has been unleashed. Where that leads us remains to be seen, but there is no such thing as a future without uranium.

Uranium had one last surprise for me. After all of the radioactive places I’ve been, what was the reading on my radiation monitor?

Well, from natural background radiation, we all get 2,000 microsieverts per year. My reading was just 280 more. For me, the journey was worth the risk.

Of course it was “worth the risk,” because that amount of additional radiation exposure posed no risk to Muller. Even if absorbed in a single, acute dose, there is no evidence in any study that human health is affected by 280 microsieverts (0.28 mSv). I’d bet that if 100 random people wore a dosimeter for a year, there would be substantially more that 280 microsieverts of variation between them.

Unlike Muller, I’m not a scientist who thinks in terms of discovering new knowledge. I’m a humanist with an engineering bent who focuses on applying knowledge widely to make life better for people.

Muller is right; nuclear energy is not yet ready to take over. My answer is not to accept that condition, but to be inspired to work on improving nuclear technology and the acceptance of nuclear technology so that it continues the process of taking over wherever appropriate.

PS: Until a little over a week ago I had not heard of Veritasium. I discovered the valuable resource after Wally, one of the amazingly bright teenagers who participated in my Duke TIP Nuclear Science class, asked me for my opinion on some of the nuclear related videos posted there.

Veritasium covers a broad range of science topics in addition to nuclear energy and physics, but I was impressed by Muller’s style and ability to explain complex subjects in short video clips. He is full of energy, excitement, and curiosity and seems able to inspire his audience to adopt some of the same attitudes about learning. He’s not just a communicator, he’s an educator.

He has attracted at least one new subscriber to his YouTube channel.

Romance of Radium – How did our relationship with radioactive material sour?

Radium glow finale

Note – This post was initially published on February 23, 2013. After attending the ANS President’s Special Session about the way we should communicate about radiation, I thought it would be worth repeating. Sometimes, we need to look outside of our immediate time and place to find “best practices” that we should emulate. Hitting road […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #239 – Sarah Laskow and the LNT model

In March 2015, Foreign Policy magazine published an article by Sarah Laskow titled The Mushroom Cloud and The X-Ray Machine. The article described the controversy over the radiation protection model known as the linear, no-threshold dose response. Ms. Laskow conducted some admirable literature research and talked with a number of well-known people. The ones that […]

Read more »

Ethics of international radiation protection system

The U. S. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) held its annual meeting in Bethesda, MD on March 16 and 17. On the second day of the meeting, Jacques Lochard, Vice Chair of the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP), gave a talk titled The Ethics of Radiation Protection. The slides from that talk are […]

Read more »

Tritium – aka radioactive hydrogen – from reactors is not a threat to human health

Fukushima Tank Farm

Tritium, also known as radioactive hydrogen, is an isotope that releases an 18 Kev beta particle. The isotopic half life is about 12 years. Among other possible production mechanisms, it is produced in low quantities and concentrations in any reactor where water is exposed to a neutron flux. The production rate is higher in heavy […]

Read more »

Presentations from NAS BEIR VIII Planning Meeting Posted

On November 17, 2014, I attended a meeting at the National Academy of Sciences building in Washington organized to determine if there is a need to convene an eighth committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VIII). The presentations given during that meeting have been published on line at Planning Towards the BEIR […]

Read more »

Is Chernobyl still dangerous or was 60 Minutes pushing propaganda?

On November 23, 2014, 60 minutes, the venerable CBS News Sunday evening program that has been on the air since its launch in 1968, aired a segment titled Chernobyl: The Catastrophe That Never Ended. The show is full of fascinating contrasts between what the cameras show to the audience and what the narrator tells the […]

Read more »

Shaping public perceptions of radiation risk

Note: The below is part of a longer work in progress. Comments and corrections are greatly appreciated. On Monday, November 17, the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 5544, the Low Dose Radiation Research Act, which called for the National Academies to “conduct a study assessing the current status and development of a long-term strategy […]

Read more »

World Nuclear Association discussion on radiation protection

I just received a link to a fascinating podcast from the World Nuclear Association about the risks associated with attempting to protect the public from low doses of radiation. It was posted almost a month ago on October 14, 2014. I apologize for initially missing this important recording and failing to bring it to your […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #224 – Dr. John Boice NCRP

From front page of June 13, 1956 New York Times. Right column headline.

On November 11, 2014, I had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. John Boice, the President of the National Council on Radiation Protection. Dr. Boice has had a long and distinguished career in radiation protection and is currently leading a multi-decade effort known as the Million Worker Study to investigate the evidence that has been […]

Read more »

Culture Imposed by Image Gently Carries Substantial Medical Risks

I’ve been engaged with the struggle to counter excessive fear of radiation for many years. Since I come at the battle from a perspective of the avoided benefits of nuclear energy production resulting from the imposed fear, I have been focused on that aspect of countering radiation misinformation. My associates and I have often assumed […]

Read more »

Radiophobia hits home

One of the members of SARI (Scientists for Accurate Radiation Information) shared a disturbing story with a happy ending. I obtained his permission to share the story more widely in hopes that others will benefit. The happy ending was a result of caregivers who listened and responded properly when provided with accurate information that conflicted […]

Read more »