Advances in high temperature nuclear reactor fuel – TRISO integrity at 1800 C!

The Idaho National Laboratory released the following exciting news on September 25, 2013.

IDAHO FALLS — A safer and more efficient nuclear fuel is on the horizon. A team of researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have reached a new milestone with tristructural-isotropic (TRISO) fuel, showing that this fourth-generation reactor fuel might be even more robust than previously thought.

Cross section of TRISO fuel particle

TRISO particle – 1 mm diameter

In the past three years, David Petti, director of the Very High Temperature Reactor Technology Development Office, and his team have studied the safety of TRISO fuel. New insights come courtesy of post-irradiation examination of the fuel, which has been a team effort between INL and ORNL.

Their findings reveal that after subjecting the fuel to extreme temperatures — far greater temperatures than it would experience during normal operation or postulated accident conditions — TRISO fuel is even more robust than expected. Specifically, the team found that even at 1,800 degrees Celsius (more than 200 degrees Celsius greater than postulated accident conditions) most fission products remained inside the fuel particles, which each boast their own primary containment system.

“The release of fission products is very low,” says Petti.

TRISO fuel particles are the size of poppy seeds. Break one open, and it looks like the inside of a tiny jaw-breaker. An outer shell of carbon coats a layer of silicon carbide, which coats another layer of carbon and the uranium center — where the energy-releasing fission happens. Byproducts of the fission process have the potential to escape the fuel, especially at very high temperatures.

To study the fuel under accident conditions, Petti and his team placed six capsules inside INL’s Advanced Test Reactor core, where they were subjected to neutron irradiation. Then, controlled, high-temperature testing of the irradiated fuel in furnaces at INL and ORNL demonstrated that fission product release remains relatively low at high temperatures postulated to occur in accidents and beyond.

“This first series of TRISO test fuel has performed above the team’s expectations, both during its three years in the ATR, and throughout the subsequent high-temperature testing,” says John Hunn, ORNL project lead for TRISO fuel development and post-irradiation examination.

TRISO particles in matrix

TRISO particles in matrix

“The ability of the fuel to retain fission products at such high temperatures translates directly to enhanced safety of the reactor,” said Paul Demkowicz, the technical lead for post-irradiation examination of TRISO fuel for the Very High Temperature Reactor program. “This sort of test data is important input for reactor design and reactor licensing.”

He and his team were able to identify the few individual particles that did secrete cesium and isolate them for further analysis. They did this by dissolving the matrix that contained the particles — thousands in each chalk-sized fuel pellet.

“We’ve developed a tool that uses computer-controlled automation to sort through thousands of irradiated particles and identify the rare defects,” said Hunn. “Careful study of these few defective particles, along with the numerous particles that perform well, allows us to complete the TRISO fuel development circle by connecting the fabrication process and material properties to performance in the reactor.”

The insights gained will also “improve our ability to fabricate even better particles in the future,” said Demkowicz.

Petti wants to further explore the fuel particles’ limits. “If the fuel performs well at 1,800 [degrees Celsius], what about higher temperatures?” he said.

This revelation comes 11 years into INL and ORNL’s joint study of TRISO fuel, which began in 2002. TRISO fuel was developed and used in Germany in the 1980s. U.S. researchers have shown that their own version of the fuel can achieve more than twice the burn-up levels — that is, the amount of the fuel that is used to release energy — clocking in at nearly 20 percent burn-up.

—INL-13-022—

(Emphasis added.)

I hope this means that the fuel needed to make Adams Engines a reality will be commercially available in the not too distant future.

Fast reactor advocates throw down gauntlet to MIT authors

Near the end of 2010, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology released a summary of a report titled The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle as part of its MIT Energy Initiative. The complete report was released a few months ago. The conclusions published that report initiated a virtual firestorm of reaction among the members of […]

Read more »

Energy Supply Worries Are Over! Natural Gas Resource Estimate Increased by 3%!

I am in a snarky mood this morning. Please forgive me while I try to explain the sources of my wry amusement – and my continuing worries that keep me from getting a good night’s sleep. Yesterday, I was in a conversation with a man who was explaining the recent changes in Nuclear Regulatory Commission […]

Read more »

Successful Alternatives to Fossil Fuel

US_non_combustion_energy

The New York Times published a story titled Certainties of 1970s Energy Crisis Have Fallen Away that caused me to fire up my keyboard to send a note back to the author. Following my personal mantra of “reduce, reuse, and recycle”, I thought I would share that note with you. Ms. Galbraith: Your article titled […]

Read more »

Plutonium: Valuable Fuel or Costly Waste?

For more than forty years, the United States and the Soviet Union built nuclear weapons and aimed them at each other’s heartlands. The process of building those weapons was expensive in strict monetary terms and in terms of sacrificing investments in more productive enterprises. Now, however, the confrontational attitude between the two countries has been […]

Read more »

Welcome to: Atomic Energy Insights

The Simple Facts One pound of uranium contains as much energy as 2 million pounds of oil. Releasing that energy from the uranium results in less than one pound of waste material that can be stored in a simple container for decades with no effect on the environment. Burning 2 million pounds of oil will […]

Read more »