Advanced Reactor leaders: Will you put one in your backyard?

I returned from the Nuclear Energy Insider International Advanced Reactor and SMR Summit with revived energy, optimism and passion for participating in an expanding effort to smooth and straighten the tortuous path associated with producing increased quantities of clean energy from atomic fission.

The effort isn’t small, it isn’t narrowly focused, and it isn’t–by any means–limited to the United States. It is exciting, potentially paradigm busting, wide ranging and the right thing to do. I can’t think of a better investment of the time I cannot spend with my family, especially my ever-entertaining young grandchildren.

While at the event, I asked a few questions. (Some who attended might quibble with my use of the word “few.”)

One question apparently intrigued people enough that the speakers began answering it before I even had a chance to ask it. There were several versions of the question, but they all boiled down to the following, generally asked of company business and technical leaders.

Will you build one in your own backyard?

Maybe this question and the answers can spread to become a meme with legs that helps the public gain a better appreciation of the nuclear energy’s proven benefits. It might help stimulate a curiosity about atomic energy’s potential to make their own lives more comfortable and prosperous while also helping human society achieve a more sustainable development path.

The idea came during a talk by Harlen Bowers, president of X-Energy, a company that Atomic Insights has covered in the past (X-Energy introduced its company and first product to Virginia chapter of ANS and Atomic Show #248 – Dr. Pete Pappano, VP Fuel Production X-Energy.

Bowers began by pointing to Elon Musk’s success in generating excitement for the Tesla 3, a car that will not even enter production for at least a year. Despite the fact that no one has seen an actual car or been able to test drive one, approximately 300,000 people have put down a $1,000 deposit to place an advanced order. Bowers stated that this show of interest provides evidence that there are people that care so much about climate change that they are willing to pay more for products that make a contribution.

Bowers talk included strong admonitions to advanced reactor companies about coming together as a community to communicate the value of their technology in terms of flexibility, siting options and as a vital contributor to the fight against climate change. He told the assembled audience that we need to be willing to take the “spears and arrows” that will be thrown our way if we put ourselves into the public spotlight to make the case of for the importance of building new nuclear power sources.

Then he said something that stimulated my question about building plants in our own backyards.

We also have actual test data that demonstrates the operational safety benefits of advanced reactor systems, but sometimes operational evidence isn’t good enough. Unfortunately, we still have people that take medical advice from Jenny McCarthy and won’t vaccinate their children. We can’t convince everyone, but the real life test data should convince the more objective stakeholders out there that it does prove our safety case.

Bowers concluded his talk as follows, “Reach out, communicate early and often and envision us as the Teslas of the nuclear industry.”

Here is the question as I first asked it. (Note: X-Energy was founded and is funded by Dr. Kam Ghaffarian, an entrepreneur whose financial resources came from prior successes in the aerospace and defense industry.)

Maybe one of the best ways to convince everybody, or almost everybody, is for Kam to buy himself a nice rural estate and put an X-Energy reactor in his backyard. Seriously, if he, or you or me or others in the industry say, “I’ll show you how confident I am. I’ll put it in my backyard. I’ll raise my children here, I’ll bring my grandchildren and show that it’s safe. We’ve seen the testing data, we understand it, but it’s hard to convince people using terms like “design basis accident” and “source term.”

What I did not say, but wish I had, is that Kam, or other industry leaders deciding to adopt this strategy should make a big splash with the announcement and sell the idea hard to neighbors by helping them understand the benefits that such a machine could provide to the whole community.

When I get more time, I will put together an audio file of some of the responses I received during the rest of day two of the summit as I asked several other company leaders, industry advocates or technical experts versions of the question.

I know it is easy to say and easy to attempt to dismiss it as the empty promise of an overly enthusiastic sales guy, but I really want to eventually power and heat my home and my community with a nearby nuclear power source. I would need a couple of cooperating neighbors as partners, but the field behind our houses might be big enough.

560 Summer BY pano

My ideal installation would be an Adams Engine, but the Xe-100 is reasonably close in concept and technology. There are other entries in the field of advanced small reactors that would also be acceptable as my next door neighbor.

I’ve a lot more content from the summit to share with you, but it’s getting too close to departure time for my next research trip. This one is back in my old stomping grounds in Annapolis, MD. It will be a little like deja vu all over again to sit in a Rickover Hall auditorium for the opening plenary of a Technical Meeting on Nuclear Energy and Cyber Security. This meeting is in recognition of the first Naval Academy graduating classes for the Nuclear Engineering and Cyber Security majors.

PS: After recent meetings in Washington, New York City, Atlanta and the coming meeting in Annapolis, the Atomic Insights travel account is shrinking. If you like having a vocal representative at these meetings who–eventually–provides you useful reports, please consider providing your financial support.



Why haven’t world leaders learned the most useful lessons from Fukushima?

Despite the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars that have been spent by governments and nuclear plant operators in the wake of three core melt events at the six-unit Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, the most useful lessons available from the experience remain unlearned. At Fukushima Daiichi, the robust, defense-in-depth approach used in nuclear […]

Read more »

Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) supports nuclear because it reduces air pollution

One of the highlights of the recent Advanced Nuclear Summit hosted in Washington, DC by Third Way was an inspirational talk by Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ). Here is a partial transcript, starting after Booker’s folksy story to set the talk’s tone. Here in this realm, we in government have to start acting boldly and let […]

Read more »

Labor and Business perspectives from White House Summit on Nuclear Energy – Liz Shuler (AFL-CIO) and Danny Roderick (Westinghouse)

On November 6, 2015, a Friday afternoon, the White House hosted a Summit on Nuclear Energy. The seats in the conference room had been filled before much information about the event had been released, but the organizers provided a live stream on the web. That turned out to have been at least as informative as […]

Read more »

Appealing to the hearts and minds of the people at APIEL

During the weekend in Knoxville, TN, I met some marvelous people who were friendly, energetic, personable, excited by life, and ready to learn how they could take small steps to make the world a better place. As reported on Saturday morning, I dressed in blue jeans and a high visibility tee shirt sporting an atomic […]

Read more »

Energy for Humanity vision explained by co-founder Kirsty Gogan

Nuclear4Climate posted the below video on their YouTube channel yesterday. It features Kirsty Gogan, the Executive Director and one of three cofounders of the U.K. based civil society group Energy for Humanity. Though there is a small issue with sound quality, I think you’ll agree that Kirsty makes a strong case for nuclear energy as […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #243 – Cara Santa Maria

Cara Santa Maria is an Emmy award-winning journalist who studied and taught neuroscience and psychology before deciding that her primary interest was in communicating about science. She was born and raised in Texas, but now lives in Los Angeles. She told me that she has found a terrific community of scientists, communicators, and other creative […]

Read more »

Nova’s “Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail”

On July 29, 2015, a week before the August 6 commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, PBS (Public Broadcast System in the US) aired a documentary titled Uranium – Twisting the Dragon’s Tail. Unlike many efforts on similar topics, this one is worth watching. More importantly, it is worth recommending […]

Read more »

Moving nuclear energy discussions forward

On Wednesday, June 24 Bloomberg BNA (Bureau of National Affairs) conducted a morning meeting titled A Chain Reaction: The Role of Nuclear Energy in New England’s Energy Mix at the Westin Copley Place in Boston, MA. The timing was fortuitous for me, my wife and I were visiting family in Maine the weekend before the […]

Read more »

Go Nuclear site is now live

Go Nuclear, Inc. has released a massively enhanced version of its website that is filled with informative videos, presentations, and articles about nuclear energy and radiation science. It is a place where one can easily lose track of time while exploring. Here is just one sample to whet your appetite. I hope Alan Waltar’s passionate […]

Read more »

Participation opportunity – Turkey Point EIS public meeting

One of the most prolific anti-nuclear activist groups, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (SACE), is distributing posts encouraging their followers to oppose FP&L’s plan to build two new reactors at the Turkey Point Power station. SACE is encouraging people to submit negative comments via the public comment process for the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) […]

Read more »

Professor Gerry Thomas explains radiation health risks

A friend whose Twitter handle is @ActinideAge just posted a link to Gerry Thomas Highlights Misconceptions over Health Impacts of Nuclear Accidents. (Embedded below.) Even though it was published in November 2014 on the UN University YouTube channel, it had received a grand total of 189 views at the time I visited on April 6, […]

Read more »