Tritium – aka radioactive hydrogen – from reactors is not a threat to human health

International tritium limits table

Tritium, also known as radioactive hydrogen, is an isotope that releases an 18 Kev beta particle. The isotopic half life is about 12 years.

Among other possible production mechanisms, it is produced in low quantities and concentrations in any reactor where water is exposed to a neutron flux. The production rate is higher in heavy water reactors because the deuterium (H-2) that is a major constituent of heavy water only needs to absorb one more neutron to turn it into tritium (H-3). Its absorption cross-section is not very large, but there is no loss term in the build up equation.

Over the years, there has been a great deal of ink spilled in articles, reports, and legal proceedings regarding the potential impacts of releasing tritium to the environment. The stimulus for this post is an article by David Biello dated February 14, 2014 titled Is Radioactive Hydrogen in Drinking Water a Cancer Threat? .

Aside: Yes, I know. That article is more than a year old. I didn’t look at the date until I began writing this post. Apparently SciAm is doing what I occasionally do here, which is to repurpose existing content. Here is a quote of the note at the top of the article “This article is from the In-Depth Report 4 Years after Fukushima.” That in-depth report was published this year, not last. End Aside.

You might want to read the original article to obtain more context for the comment that I’ve reprinted below.

It is disappointing to read an article in Scientific American that provides such a scientifically inaccurate description of the way that the beta particles from tritium (free moving electrons that are only slightly accelerated compared to those produced in a normal electrical circuit) react with matter.

Those electrons do not “slam into DNA, a ribosome or some other biologically important molecule.” They interact with the electrons in all of the matter that they pass through, including air and water. Even in air, beta particles from tritium decay travel a MAXIMUM distance of 6 mm.

In more dense material, like biological matter, they travel a substantially shorter distance.

Living cells are composed primarily of water. DNA and other biologically important molecules are a small portion of the total mass. Most of the energy in the slow moving beta from tritium gets shared with the electron clouds of other molecules through inelastic collisions and the Bremsstrahlung effect, which turns the kinetic energy of the beta emission into electromagnetic radiation. That is the same kind of radiation that surrounds us in our modern, electrified lives.

The other important feature of tritium is that it is an isotope of hydrogen, one of the most common elements in our environment. When you mix tritium with water, the isotope inherently mixes with all other hydrogen isotopes, resulting in an irreversible dilution.

Anyone with any reasonable understanding of physics will know that a mixture of isotopes of the same element is nearly impossible to separate into the constituent isotopes without the imposition of a great deal of energy and some pretty fancy technology.

No natural biological process has any means of concentrating tritium once is is released into an environment full of other hydrogen isotopes.

It is absurdly amusing to read the following, knowing how much money has been wasted over the years in futile attempts to remove tritium from water to “protect” people against a non-existent threat.

“You need huge study populations to have any chance of seeing anything,” Kocher notes, and that money is simply unavailable. “There is no compelling need to spend the money required to do this.”

If there is no compelling need to spend money to find out that tritium at the concentrations that can possibly be accessible to humans is not hazardous, then there is no compelling need to spend money to attempt to capture it or separate it from water.

Let dilution be the solution to this particular phantom worry.

Of course, the money that has been spent on various solutions to the non-problem of tritium has been “revenue” for a large number of parties who are interested in maintaining or tightening the existing regulations. Instead of looking to variations in state rules, I wish the author had turned to our northern neighbors to find out that their drinking water limit is 10 times higher than ours or to Australia to find out theirs is 100 times higher.

In neither case is drinking water full of tritium at the limit dangerous to human beings.

Rod Adams
Publisher, Atomic Insights

Fukushima Tank Farm

Fukushima Tank Farm

There is a large, expensive, and worrisome tank farm full of tritiated water on the site of what used to be the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power station. That tank farm is complicating the process of cleaning up the site. The most logical, lowest cost solution is to simply empty the tanks into the adjacent sea and to recycle the materials used to construct the tanks into something more useful.

Atomic Show #227 – Carmen Bigles, Coqui Radiopharmaceuticals

CarmenBigles-headshot-205x300

Coqui Radiopharmaceuticals is a start-up company founded in 2009 with a laser focus on solving a problem affecting the health of tens of thousands of people. The founder, Carmen Bigles, noticed that many of the patients arriving at her clinic had not been properly diagnosed and discovered that the reason for that condition was an […]

Read more »

Radiation, Pollution and Radiophobia

Cover - Nuclear Shadowboxing

While researching answers to comments made on the Atomic Insights post titled Healthy doses of radiation, I found a book titled Nuclear Shadowboxing: Legacies and Challenges. It includes a fascinating appendix titled Radiation, Pollution and Radiophobia that should be required reading for people who are interested in understanding more about the health effects of low […]

Read more »

Gold standard nuclear regulator – CNSC

If you want to know something about radiation and have a five minute time window, invest your available time by watching What is Radiation: Understanding Radiation With the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. In my opinion, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has lapped the competition. They are in a commanding lead as the true “gold standard” […]

Read more »

Airborne radiation at WIPP

Update: A reader pointed out that the headline is inaccurate. The issue at WIPP is airborne contamination (by radioactive material), not airborne radiation. In order to be gentle with search engines and existing links, the headline will remain as is. End Update. On Friday, February 14 at 11:30 pm, a continuous air monitoring alarm went […]

Read more »

On Plutonium, Nuclear War, and Nuclear Peace

By NNadir I trust — and I hope I am justified in this — that no one wants a nuclear war. I know I don’t. We already have a set of environmental problems that are worse than a limited nuclear war, and may be facing an environmental crisis that might be as dire as a […]

Read more »

Another update on “highly radioactive” water leaks at Fukushima

The media frenzy about the detection of water leaks from the vast tank farm that Tokyo Electric Power Company has been forced to build to store water used to cool the three damaged cores at their Fukushima Daiichi power station continues to sizzle, even in the face of the potential for US attack on Syria. […]

Read more »

UCS is guilty of harming humans by reinforcing fear mongering

Correction: (Posted at 6:43 on 6/16/2013) I made a boneheaded error in the below computation and dropped an important prefix in my units. That error resulted in my final number being off by a factor of 1000; I wrote 0.001 mrem when it should have been 0.001 rem. I apologize for the math error. I […]

Read more »

How much I-131 and Cs-137 was released into atmosphere at Fukushima?

Total mass of main isotopes of concern from Fukushima: I-131 – 43 grams Cs-137 – 4 kilograms The Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology Volume 50, Issue 3, 2013 contains a paper titled Source term estimation of atmospheric release due to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident by atmospheric and oceanic dispersion simulations. Using […]

Read more »

Familiarity breeds understanding and acceptance of radiation

After reading Dr. Jerry Cuttler’s paper about the need to restore the basis of radiation regulations to tolerance doses, an Atomic Insights reader provided the link to the above video posted by bionerd23 on YouTube. It is one of several informative videos that she has shared with the world about her explorations to increase both […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #194 – What do you do with the waste?

The first Atomic Show of 2013 is a geeky, chemistry laden discussion aimed at helping to answer the question that many people who fight nuclear energy try to use as their trump card “What do you do with the waste.” It often makes their head spin or makes them put their fingers into their ears […]

Read more »

Radioimmunontherapy (RIT) for follicular lymphoma

Andrew Schorr, the founder and host of Patient Power, interviewed Dr. Anton Hagenbeek of the University Medical Center Utrecht Netherlands about the result of clinical trials of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) to combat follicular lymphoma. The treatment uses a monoclonal antibody that is covalently bound to Y-90, which is a beta emitter. The monoclonal antibody selectively binds […]

Read more »