Atomic Show #220 – Atoms for California

Andrew Benson from Atoms For California contacted me last week to find out if I was interested in having a conversation about the history of nuclear energy in California, with a special focus on the history of the antinuclear movement in that trend-setting state. It sounded like a great idea for an Atomic Show so I jumped at the chance.

Andrew is not exactly a household name. He described himself as a “lowly energy analyst” at the California Energy Commission who recently completed a double major in political science and economics at the University of California Davis.

He has recently developed a strong interest in nuclear energy and in learning more about how our society has arrived at its current situation with regard to the use of that important, game-changing technology.

Andrew’s father is a Senior Reactor Operator at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). Though he still holds that title and will remain employed by the facility until he completes his career and retires, his father and many of the people he knows had their lives suddenly altered on June 7, 2013 when Southern California Edison announced that it was going to permanently close SONGS.

Andrew knew that the plant was readily repairable, but he also watched the powerful alignment of political forces who worked hard to make it as difficult and as financially risky as possible for SCE to continue trying to obtain permission to repair and restart the plant. For a time, Andrew’s father was not sure that he would be able to keep his job and remain in San Diego, where he and his family have lived for the past 30 years.

As an energy analyst at the California Energy Commission, Andrew is exposed to detailed information that is rarely read by the public about the effects that the closure decision is having on the California electricity grid and on the ability of the state to maintain a reliable supply of electricity.

We talked about the antinuclear movement history, the various energy options that California is developing and the possibility that the future will be different from the past. We mentioned some of the land impacts of unreliables like wind and solar, especially when installed as large scale facilities on undisturbed land. Here is the visual image that Andrew mentioned during the show.

Wind farm land impact is not limited to turbine foundation

Wind farm land impact is not limited to turbine foundation

It was a fascinating discussion. Andrew is a well-spoken young man who has realized that he has a pro-nuclear energy passion. He is, by the way, just 22 years old.

I hope you all enjoy the show.

Here are links to publications discussed during the show.

Critical Masses (part 1): http://atoms4ca.tumblr.com/post/93940226103/book-review-part-1-of-2-critical-masses
Critical Masses (Part 2): http://atoms4ca.tumblr.com/post/94513900168/critical-masses-2
Just some assorted links about the challenges to a renewables only approach: http://atoms4ca.tumblr.com/post/94608672208/assorted-graphs-renewables-only-challenges


A few more things – if you think this kind of program is valuable, feel free to make a donation that will assist in growing the Atomic Show audience. One of our goals is to begin to purchase carefully placed advertising. We want more and more people to have the opportunity to listen to people like Andrew so that they begin to recognize the importance of clean energy in our lives. We want them to be able to follow the money and understand who benefits when plants like San Onofre are forced to close.






If you think, but I’ve already donated, ask yourself how many times you have tipped your favorite bartender, waitress, garbage man or valet. Is the service provided here any less valuable?

It’s also important to recognize who is bearing the brunt of successful antinuclear actions like the ones that experienced in Southern California.

If you are a fairly typical nuclear professional, you receive a decent salary and have good career prospects. Be aware, however, that there are numerous facilities that face political opposition that is as strong as the groups that forced SONGS to permanently retire as a result of a single steam generator u-tube leak that was not even in excess of the technical specification that would have forced a shut down.

So far, most displaced nukes have found good jobs at other facilities, but the demand for your services right now is limited due to the increased supply of available, well-trained workers from places like SONGS, Crystal River, Kewaunee, and Vermont Yankee. The law of supply and demand applies to skilled workers as well as to commodities like electricity.

Play

Amory Lovins-speak: Three misleading statements in a 15 second sound bite

I had the opportunity to be in the audience during the above talk. You might notice my impolite interjections; I have often been accused of being very poor at hiding my real reactions and feelings. There is a reason why I stopped playing poker during game nights on the USS Stonewall Jackson. I was losing […]

Read more »

Uranium supply concerns associated with EEU

Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan signed an agreement to form a Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) on May 29. Uranium market watchers should pay close attention and understand the potential implications of the alliance on the stability of the world’s uranium supply, even though the alliance has been dismissed as unimportant by some media pundits. For example, […]

Read more »

Mark Cooper is wrong about SMRs and nuclear energy

Mark Cooper of the Vermont Law School has published another paper in a series critiquing the economics of nuclear energy; this one is titled The Economic Failure of Nuclear Power and the Development of a Low Carbon Electricity Future: Why Small Modular Reactors are Part of the Problem and Not the Solution. It is not […]

Read more »

Existing nuclear plants are valuable and worth saving

Many currently operating nuclear plants are in danger of being permanently shut down due to temporary conditions including low, but volatile natural gas prices, improperly designed markets that fail to recognize the value of reliable generating capacity, quotas and mandates that result in certain types of electrical generators receiving direct monetary payments in addition to […]

Read more »

Vermont Yankee and B&W mPower – Victims of Wall Street Greed

Though it has been a little quiet here on Atomic Insights in the past few days, I have been working on some stories documenting financial maneuvers in the US energy industry — especially as it related to nuclear energy. You might be interested in reading Save Vermont Yankee. If not you, who? If not now, […]

Read more »

Should anti-fossil expansion movement align with pro nuclear movement?

On April 11, 2014, Roger Annis, a member of the Vancouver Ecosocialist Group, gave a talk at the University of California Santa Barbara. The talk was titled Oil, tar sands, coal, natural gas: What’s behind the expansion drive of Canada’s and North America’s fossil fuel industries? It is a fascinating talk with some excellent slides […]

Read more »

SMRs – Why Not Now? Then When?

I have shamelessly borrowed the title of one of the talks given during the first day of the Nuclear Energy Insider 4th Annual Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Conference as being representative of both the rest of the agenda and the conversations that I had in the hallways during the breaks. For the past five years, […]

Read more »

SUNY Maritime Student Advocates Commercial Nuclear Ship Propulsion

Stimulated by early atomic optimism, naval successes and Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace initiative, four nations built ocean going ships with nuclear propulsion plants. The US built the NS Savannah, Germany built the Otto Hahn, Japan built the Mutsu, and Russia built a series of nuclear powered icebreakers. For reasons that are beyond the scope of […]

Read more »

Energy versus Power – Energy delivered rapidly equals power

A BusinessWeek article titled Putin $14 Billion Nuclear Deal Wins Over Russia Critic Orban recognizes the importance of recent Russian power deals to supply gas, oil, and nuclear energy facilities. There is widespread confusion about energy versus power. Conversations about the business of selling hydrocarbons or electricity are described as being about energy, but the […]

Read more »

Professional antinuclear greens resist; greens concerned about climate change embrace

Fissures related to nuclear energy are developing in the monolithic movement known as Environmentalism. The Breakthrough Institute has published a good introduction to the schism titled The Great Green Meltdown: How Economic Arguments Against Nuclear Highlight Environmentalist Delusions. Though this is a simplification, it is generally accurate to describe two sides of the movement that […]

Read more »

Greg Jaczko claims nuclear is too expensive and that unreliables will take its place

The above clip is titled Nuclear power for the future. It describes the industry leading example of the construction project at Plant Vogtle in northeastern Georgia and it includes some opining on America’s energy future by Greg Jaczko the former Chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The video correctly points to the fact that […]

Read more »