TV series marathon – Men Who Built America

I took advantage of circumstances and technology last night to indulge in a TV series marathon consisting of watching the entire season of the 2012 History Channel series titled The Men Who Built America. Though originally aired in 19 episodes, Netflix is showing series as four 80-90 minute segments.

One of the most eye-opening things about the series is the near gushing admiration provided by modern capitalists about “how the game was played” back then.

Watched all at once, it is a bit repetitive, since each show includes scenes from previous shows to help the audience catch up. However, it is an experience worth your time if you have an evening by yourself or with a patient loved one.

The series focuses on four of the most influential and ruthless capitalists in American history – Cornelius Vanderbuilt (shipping and railroads), John D. Rockefeller (oil), Andrew Carnegie (steel), and J. Pierpont Morgan (finance). Narration and commentary is provided by both business historians and modern capitalists like Jack Welch, Carly Fiorina, Donald Trump, and Mark Cuban. John D. Rockefeller IV provides several insights into his great-grandfather’s business practices.

Minor characters in the drama include Tom Scott, Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, George Westinghouse, and Henry Frick. Here is a trailer focusing on Rockefeller.

One of the reasons I recommend watching this series is that it provides some context supporting one of the major themes of Atomic Insights – businessmen who are motivated to accumulate wealth and power as a way to keep score and compete against their rivals may build powerful and important enterprises, but they can also be terribly destructive influences on vast numbers of human beings.

There are stories about the Homestake steel mill strike massacre, the Johnstown PA flood (caused by the collapse of a dam owned by a private club of capitalists who couldn’t be bothered to strengthen it), a shocking death rate of 1 out of 11 workers per year in steel mills, and several depressions instigated by petty rivalry-based business decisions.

One segment that resonates with similarities to current business/political issue is Rockefeller’s decision to build a network of carefully located pipelines as a way to break the influence of railroads on oil transportation. The railroads try hard to stop the pipeline construction because of the impact they know it will have on their freight volumes.

Despite denials, competition with rail over freight transportation is a major underlying part of the controversy over Keystone XL. Burlington Northern and the Canadian National Railway have no desire to give up their profitable cargos to the pipeline companies. Trace the funding sources for the groups publicly engaged in the loud political battle and you will find some interesting relationships to rail titans. IMO, the controversy has little to do with real concerns about climate change.

The Men Who Built America series provides numerous examples of the purposeful use of FUD — fear, uncertainty and doubt — to scare people away from purchasing competitive products.

  • Rockefeller markets Standard Oil kerosene as a safer, more consistent product than the volatile stuff available from rivals.
  • Rockefeller plants stories of home infernos to create fear of electricity because he recognizes that it threatens his kerosene lighting monopoly.
  • Edison supplies New York with an A. C. powered electric chair in a failed attempt to spread fear about a competitive electricity standard to his D. C.
  • Carnegie tells his associates that no one will purchase Rockefeller’s Mesabi Range iron ore because it is too powdery and will gum up blast furnaces.

One of the most eye-opening things about the series is the near gushing admiration provided by modern capitalists about “how the game was played” back then. There are few, if any words of concern for the fact that the titans built their empires on the backs on poorly-paid, poorly-treated, hard-working human beings. There is also little to no recognition of the fact that men did not build America without the crucial assistance of millions of women.

The final episode talks about the efforts by Carnegie and Rockefeller at the end of their lives to give away a small portion of their accumulated wealth in highly publicized, monument-building endeavors designed to leave a better impression of their life’s impact. That also stimulated haunting thoughts about modern American businessmen.

Once you’ve watched the series, especially the first few segments, you might have a better understanding of why I continue to believe that the real strength underneath the vocal antinuclear movement comes from the established enterprises that see abundant power from the superfuels of uranium, plutonium and thorium as major threats to their wealth and power.

Energizing visit to UC Berkeley’s Nuclear Engineering Department

On Feb 9, 2015, I had the opportunity to visit the faculty and students at the University of California Berkeley. Prof. Per Peterson invited me out to give a colloquium talk and to see some of the interesting work that his colleagues and students were doing in advanced nuclear technology. One of the primary research […]

Read more »

Prevention is Easier and Less Painful Than Cure – Keep Vermont Yankee Operable

Vermont_Yankee

One of the well known techniques for minimizing the impact of an important report whose news some people don’t want to hear is to hold it for release until late Friday evening. That way, conventional journalists will not pay much attention until Monday morning and there will be some amount of decay in interest level […]

Read more »

Power In New England: Why are Prices Increasing so Rapidly?

On October 20, IBM announced that it was spinning off its chip division by paying GlobalFoundries $1.5 billion. GlobalFoundaries appears to have won the deal with its geographic position of owning fabrication facilities in New York as well as in Germany and Malaysia. The move didn’t surprise many, as there have been rumors that IBM […]

Read more »

Paterson’s plan for CO2 emission reductions

Windmills at the windmill farm Middelgrunden

Owen Paterson, who served as the UK’s environment secretary until a cabinet realignment during the summer of 2014, is planning to begin advocating a dramatic course change for his country’s energy policy. Instead of the wind-heavy plan that was developed by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc) in order to attempt to implement […]

Read more »

Antinuclear activists are too modest

Jim Conca has published a couple of recent posts on Forbes.com about the premature closure of nuclear power plants in the United States. One titled Are California’s Carbon Goals Kaput? focuses on some of the environmental aspects of the San Onofre debacle; the other, titled Closing Vermont Nuclear Bad Business for Everyone focuses on the […]

Read more »

Purposeful price pumping by constraining supply

James Conca recently published a commentary on Forbes titled Closing Vermont Nuclear Bad Business For Everyone. A major thrust of Conca’s initial post was highlighting the rapidly rising prices of electricity in New England that are being driven by an increasing reliance on natural gas as reliable power generators like the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant […]

Read more »

Helping people understand the power grid

Yesterday, the Institute for Energy Research launched a project to help people gain a better understanding of the electric power grid, a marvel of modern society that most people take for granted — unless its product delivery is interrupted for more than a few minutes. This information project is timely, especially considering all of the […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #220 – Atoms for California

Wind farm land impact is not limited to turbine foundation

Andrew Benson from Atoms For California contacted me last week to find out if I was interested in having a conversation about the history of nuclear energy in California, with a special focus on the history of the antinuclear movement in that trend-setting state. It sounded like a great idea for an Atomic Show so […]

Read more »

Amory Lovins-speak: Three misleading statements in a 15 second sound bite

I had the opportunity to be in the audience during the above talk. You might notice my impolite interjections; I have often been accused of being very poor at hiding my real reactions and feelings. There is a reason why I stopped playing poker during game nights on the USS Stonewall Jackson. I was losing […]

Read more »

Uranium supply concerns associated with EEU

Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan signed an agreement to form a Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) on May 29. Uranium market watchers should pay close attention and understand the potential implications of the alliance on the stability of the world’s uranium supply, even though the alliance has been dismissed as unimportant by some media pundits. For example, […]

Read more »

Mark Cooper is wrong about SMRs and nuclear energy

Mark Cooper of the Vermont Law School has published another paper in a series critiquing the economics of nuclear energy; this one is titled The Economic Failure of Nuclear Power and the Development of a Low Carbon Electricity Future: Why Small Modular Reactors are Part of the Problem and Not the Solution. It is not […]

Read more »