Atomic Show #231 – Grandparents for nuclear energy

For Sunday December 21, 2014, I sent out a standard invite to my list of the usual suspects for an Atomic Show round table. As the responses came in, I realized that random chance had ensured that every one of the people on the call was a grandparent. It seemed kind of appropriate to talk about what we were doing to try to make the world a better place to leave to our young, energetic grandchildren.

We talked about the irrational, but powerful efforts in California to force Diablo Canyon off of the grid. The most recent push is justified by a single “differing professional opinion” about whether or not the plant is operating within the seismic assumptions of its design and operating license. Not surprisingly, people who have been professionally engaged for decades in actions to keep the plant from supplying its 2,000 MW of ultra-low emission, zero fossil fuel electricity to California consumers have seized on that DPO to justify another organized push.

They are being fully supported in their efforts by Senator Barbara Boxer, who took one last shot at the plant in an unusual hearing held on December 3, 2014 while she still held the gavel for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Senator Boxer was the only Senator in the hearing room; two of her three guests have been organizing efforts to shut down Diablo Canyon for years, one of whom has been engaged in that activity as his full time employment since before the plant began operating.

We also discussed our sorrow that Vermont Yankee is being shut down within the next week or so. I expressed my anger at the plant owner and the nuclear industry for their seeming inability to figure out how to profitably operate a low marginal cost nuclear plant in one of the highest priced electricity markets in the country. I told my guests that I harbor some suspicions that actions to permanently close necessary and well-maintained production facilities approaches the borders of actions that are supposed to be prevented by the Sherman Antitrust Act.

We mentioned the excellent piece published by the Brookings Institute by Josh Freed of Third Way titled Back to the Future: Advanced Nuclear Energy and the Battle Against Climate Change. (I promised during the show to include a link to that article in these show notes.)

We talked a lot about tactics used by politically savvy antinuclear organizations and what we can learn from their successes during the past several decades. We expressed our frustration at the near silence of the nuclear industry and its complete lack of support for the efforts of voluntary, pronuclear advocates.

We ended the show by describing some of our plans for the next week or so.

Guests on this show included:

Dan Yurman, the publisher of Neutron Bytes and the former publisher of Idaho Samizdat
Meredith Angwin, the publisher of Yes Vermont Yankee and a major contributor to Northwest Clean Energy
Les Corrice, the publisher of Hiroshima Syndrome, the go-to site for anyone interested in finding out what is happening in Japanese energy post-Fukushima
Bill Gloege, the founder of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, a citizens group specifically formed to educate people about the environmental benefits of nuclear energy compared to all other potential power sources

Play

Protecting our shared environment is a conservative value and a liberal responsibility

It is past time to move towards a broader view of our shared responsibility to protect our environment, seek improved prosperity, and leave a better world than the one to which we were born. The political boundary lines that seem to have been hardened in recent years are preventing us from cooperating, even in areas […]

Read more »

ICYMI – James Webb is exploring a run for President in 2016

James Webb is a successful author, lawyer, former Marine infantry officer, and graduate of the US Naval Academy class of 1968. In addition to his service in combat during the Vietnam war, he has a track record of civilian public service as an Assistant Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Navy during the Reagan […]

Read more »

Paul Wilson & Bret Bennington vs Arnie Gundersen & Heidi Hutner on Nuclear Sustainability

On Nov 20, 2014, Hofstra University hosted its annual Pride and Purpose Debate. This year’s proposition was the following – “Should nuclear energy be expanded to help create a more sustainable future?” The debate included the following panelists: For – J Bret Bennington, professor of geology, Department of Geology, Environment and Sustainability at Hofstra University. […]

Read more »

Political battles hampering function of important agency

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is supposed to be an independent regulator with the mission of regulating the use of radioactive materials to adequately protect public safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment. Unfortunately, the Commission has become a political battle ground that makes life difficult for the people appointed to lead […]

Read more »

Antinuclear activists are too modest

Jim Conca has published a couple of recent posts on Forbes.com about the premature closure of nuclear power plants in the United States. One titled Are California’s Carbon Goals Kaput? focuses on some of the environmental aspects of the San Onofre debacle; the other, titled Closing Vermont Nuclear Bad Business for Everyone focuses on the […]

Read more »

Continuing conversation with NRC Chairman Macfarlane

On September 11, 2014, the American Nuclear Society hosted a roundtable discussion for nuclear bloggers with Allison Macfarlane, the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The meeting was broadcast as a webinar, but there were also seats available in the conference room from which Dr. Macfarlane and Margaret Harding (the ANS moderator) were running the […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #223 – Diablo Saudi UAE Ukraine S Korea

On September 7, 2014, I gathered a group of nuclear energy observers to discuss a variety of topics of interest to people who believe energy is important. We talked about Diablo Canyon’s earthquake resilience, Saudi Arabia’s interest in a rapid growth in nuclear energy production, the certification of the APR+ in South Korea, the progress […]

Read more »

Is it really necessary to have a deep geologic repository for used nuclear fuel?

Though I have often received quizzical, almost uncomprehending looks from my type ‘A’ colleagues on submarines and in my other jobs, I’ve often been guided by a simple principal of decision-making – “If it’s too hard, quit.” Please don’t think that means I’m the type of person who can never get anything done or who […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #222 – How Proposed EPA CO2 Rule Rewards States for Replacing Nuclear With Gas

On August 20, 2014, Remy DeVoe, a graduate student in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee, published an earthshaking piece on ANS Nuclear Cafe titled Unintended Anti-Nuclear Consequences Lurking in the EPA Clean Power Plan. Unfortunately, there has been a bit of a delayed reaction; so far, only the most carefully tuned instruments have […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #221 – Acting Locally

On August 25, 2014, a group of atomic energy advocates gathered to share experiences and advice about how nuclear energy advocates can more effectively act locally. We discussed ways to find people who are interested in atomic energy, ways to develop social interaction, ways to show our humanity, and ways to make it fun to […]

Read more »

Esso Italiana paid political parties for specific “corporate objectives” including oil instead of nuclear

In 1972, an Exxon internal audit disclosed that Esso Italiana, Exxon’s Italian subsidiary, had been making payments to Italian political parties that were tied by amount to specific corporate objectives. One of the objectives that was listed on documents seized by Italian authorities was halting nuclear energy development in Italy in favor of burning more […]

Read more »