Additional evidence re: nonproliferation & antinuclear alliance

After posting Nonproliferation is a disguised antinuclear energy effort, I received the following comment via email. The author has given me permission to share it, with attribution.

I know John Holdren well and this article in spot on. John does not weigh energy poverty very high and weighs nuclear weapons proliferation exceedingly highly.

This dominates his stand on nuclear power. In his articulation on objections to nuclear power he is careful to not allow nonproliferation arguments to enter often but rather to say things such as recycle should not be done because it is not economical at today’s price of uranium—this is the line from papers with Matt Bunn.

We know the real reason is his super concern over proliferation of nuclear weapons. He believes if nuclear is widely used it will enhance the chances of weapons being used. I suspect this is the hidden reason he does not push to get resolved the controversy over linear versus threashhold dose response to low levels of radiation. If radiation safety regulations became more rational the cost of nuclear power would lower substantially.

Ralph Moir
Vallecitos Molten Salt Research

Dr. Moir earned his doctorate in nuclear engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1967 and a BS in Engineering Physics from the University of California at Berkeley in 1962. He is a Registered Professional Nuclear Engineer in the State of California, Registration number NU782, a fellow of the American Physical Society and American Nuclear Society. His CV and list of publications is available online.

Another piece of evidence of the way that the passionate people focused on preventing nuclear weapons proliferation have been harnessed as foot soldiers in a battle against the use of nuclear energy showed up in a July 18, 2014 article on CounterPunch titled Fukushima: Bad and Getting Worse. Here is the quote:

IPPNW [International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War] is the Nobel Peace Prize winning global federation of doctors working for “a healthier, safer and more peaceful world.” The group has adopted a highly critical view of nuclear power because as it says, “A world without nuclear weapons will only be possible if we also phase out nuclear energy.”

A world without nuclear energy is a world that is more dependent on the Earth’s rapidly diminishing store of hydrocarbons supplemented at the whim of the weather by diffuse energy flows that require physically massive collectors. It is a world where the people who control the hydrocarbon resources control an ever increasing share of global wealth and power.

Some commenters on the previous post challenged my assertion that efforts to hamper nuclear energy inevitably provide financial benefits to people who control hydrocarbons, saying that my proof was lacking a direct connection between people like John Holdren and fossil fuel interests.

My response is to suggest that people who are interested in learning more should search Atomic Insights for “smoking gun” and search the web for “Holdren Rockefeller”. People who are convinced that I am merely being conspiratorial can continue believing whatever they want to believe.

Nonproliferation is a disguised antinuclear energy effort

I stumbled across a 1983 article titled Nuclear power and nuclear weapons: the connection is dangerous that is the clearest piece of evidence I’ve found to prove that many of the basic talking points of the nuclear nonproliferation crowd are actually aimed at slowing, halting and reversing the use of nuclear energy. These efforts have […]

Read more »

Atomic Show #217 – Michael Mariotte, President NIRS

At the suggestion of a long time Atomic Insights contributor and Atomic Show listener, I invited Michael Mariotte for a guest appearance on the Atomic Show. In the small world made up of active nuclear advocates and people adamantly opposed to nuclear energy, Mariotte and his organization are famous — or infamous, depending on one’s […]

Read more »

Is Cuomo’s fix against Indian Point already in?

Governor Andrew Cuomo has never tried to hide the fact that he wants to follow in his father’s footsteps. Like Mario, Andrew became Governor of New York. Like Mario, Andrew has established political and financial alliances with well-heeled donors that do not like nuclear energy. Like Mario, Andrew would like to be remembered as a […]

Read more »

Dr. Helen Caldicott versus emission-free nuclear energy

Gordon McDowell is a Canadian film-maker who has a strong interest in molten salt reactors using thorium. However, he is also supportive of other forms of nuclear energy as beneficial sources of emission-free energy. You can find more of his work on his YouTube channel. Like many of my associates and colleagues, Gordon has a […]

Read more »

Mark Cooper is wrong about SMRs and nuclear energy

Mark Cooper of the Vermont Law School has published another paper in a series critiquing the economics of nuclear energy; this one is titled The Economic Failure of Nuclear Power and the Development of a Low Carbon Electricity Future: Why Small Modular Reactors are Part of the Problem and Not the Solution. It is not […]

Read more »

Mangano and Sherman take down

Ian Goddard is an independent investigative journalist who likes to dig deeply into original source material and to follow leads to their logical conclusion. Even though he is not a medical doctor, he has done research of suitable quality to get it published on the National Institutes of Health PubMed site. He produces both written […]

Read more »

Smoking Gun – NCPC & John F. Kennedy

There is a folder in the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum titled National Coal Policy Conference that documents an apparently successful effort to influence a rising political star to support national policies that favor coal over natural gas, residual oil and atomic energy. The NCPC, whose existence lasted from its founding in 1959 […]

Read more »

Anti nuclear movement strategy circa April 1991

A friend of mine is cleaning out his basement in preparation for a move. He’s been in the nuclear industry for many years and actively participated in some of the public battles that activists have initiated to slow or halt new development and seek closure or cancellation of existing projects. He found a legible, but […]

Read more »

Nuclear Energy: Past, Present, and Future

Peter Bradford and Rod Adams

On Friday, March 28, 2014, I had the privilege of attending a symposium at Dartmouth College titled Three Mile Island 35th Anniversary Symposium: The Past, Present, and Future of Nuclear Energy. If you are curious and have a free nine hours, you can watch an archived copy of the main event on YouTube. The thing […]

Read more »

Critical Analysis of Mousseau Fukushima Presentation

no. of birds vs. radiation field from Mousseau

Editor’s Note: On March 11, 2013, Dr. Timothy Mousseau gave a presentation at the Helen Caldicott sponsored symposium on the Medical and Ecological Consequences of Fukushima. This analysis by Dr. Patrick Walden, was posted as a TRIUMF wiki soon after that event and is republished here with his permission. Dr. Walden is a retired nuclear […]

Read more »